Novice, Intermediate, Expert ...

28 views
Skip to first unread message

Alexander Praetorius

unread,
Jun 1, 2014, 3:39:28 PM6/1/14
to js-drip-d...@googlegroups.com
I really enjoy the drips of javascript i receive and sometimes they teach me something.
Other times, i think, they are important to be known, but i find myself knowing them already.
If the drips would become more challenging and advanced, maybe that would be bad for people who are new to javascript.
But i would like to join an "intermediate drips" mailinglist and eventually raise to "expert drips list" when i figure that intermediate also becomes simple enough for me.

Joshua Clanton

unread,
Jun 12, 2014, 11:50:23 AM6/12/14
to js-drip-d...@googlegroups.com
Hey Alexander,

I think that's a great idea. Unfortunately, it's also hard to consistently estimate what is beginner vs intermediate with the wide range of backgrounds people have. And as of right now I don't have the bandwidth to build up the necessary backlog for something like that.

However, if you have specific intermediate/expert topics to suggest, I'd love to hear them!

Thanks,

Josh Calnton

Phillip Senn

unread,
Jun 24, 2014, 1:06:40 PM6/24/14
to js-drip-d...@googlegroups.com
Maybe you could crowd source it.
At the end of the email ask two questions:
1. Do you like this tip?
2. What level is this tip (1=Beginner, 2=Intermediate, 3=Advanced)

tomByrer

unread,
Jul 3, 2014, 3:25:29 AM7/3/14
to js-drip-d...@googlegroups.com
Kinda hard to peg levels sometimes.
Some are obvious to level; like callbacks are at least intermediate.
You'd think that minifing files would be something that beginners would grasp, but I've seen many 'experts' shun minifing..

Phillip Senn

unread,
Jul 3, 2014, 12:13:22 PM7/3/14
to js-drip-d...@googlegroups.com
Each person would define their own interpretation as to whether a feature is a beginner feature or not.
I think it would work.

Take wikipedia as an example: on the surface, it's not possible for Wikipedia to work.  Too many people would vandalize it.
And yet it does work.  Inexplicably.

I think crowd sourcing amongst thoughtful people could work.
If you're a novice, then you are trying to gauge where to start.
Looking a table that says that x people think it's beginner level assures you that it's worth learning.

Matt Mischewski

unread,
Jul 9, 2014, 10:39:15 AM7/9/14
to js-drip-d...@googlegroups.com

What about functional vs object oriented approach related to creating rich models / data interface?

As reference there is this approach, in coffeescript but you'll get the idea


And on the same subject the comments at the bottom of this article are particularly interesting, but lack a rival implementation to fully appreciate the strengths and weaknesses


The question I have is related whether or not using bacon.JS like this fits? What I understand of functional programming (which is not enough) is that data should populate POJO's and the functions would massage the data to desired outputs.

Following on from that or perhaps a pre-cursor it would be great to understand more about how bacon.js is put together and effective implementation strategies for streaming events / creating bacon.bus and how  browserification of node.js stream would provide an alternative to bacon.js?


Then perhaps this could lead to an explanation of outpace sees clojuescript as advantageous to solving complex problems?



Hope that makes sense, as obviously doesn't fully make sense to me.

Cheers

Matt



Matt Mischewski

unread,
Jul 9, 2014, 10:41:52 AM7/9/14
to js-drip-d...@googlegroups.com
Add highland into the mix

http://highlandjs.org/
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages