Groups
Conversations
All groups and messages
Send feedback to Google
Help
Training
Sign in
Groups
jPOS Users
Conversations
About
Sort By Relevance
Sort By Date
1–30 of many
flavian machimbirike
, …
Mark Salter
16
11/8/23
Error unpacking termapp.iso response
request to
postilion
. > > Kind regards > > Flavian > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:41 AM 'Mark Salter' via jPOS Users < > jpos-users@googlegroups.com
unread,
Error unpacking termapp.iso response
request to
postilion
. > > Kind regards > > Flavian > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:41 AM 'Mark Salter' via jPOS Users < > jpos-users@googlegroups.com
11/8/23
Babatunde Oyenekan
, …
Andrés Alcarraz
6
3/11/23
JCEHandler can't find specified provider class
got from
Postilion
. And you would use that key, to translate the pin blocks to your zone key for validation if you are an issuer. Or to translate the PIN blocks captured by the terminal
unread,
JCEHandler can't find specified provider class
got from
Postilion
. And you would use that key, to translate the pin blocks to your zone key for validation if you are an issuer. Or to translate the PIN blocks captured by the terminal
3/11/23
Collins Adom Baffour
,
Alejandro Revilla
2
2/17/23
ATALA KEY BLOCKS
blocks in
Postilion
HSM and configure key > exchange? > > -- > -- > jPOS is licensed under AGPL - free for community usage for your > open-source project. Licenses
unread,
ATALA KEY BLOCKS
blocks in
Postilion
HSM and configure key > exchange? > > -- > -- > jPOS is licensed under AGPL - free for community usage for your > open-source project. Licenses
2/17/23
Collins Adom Baffour
2/14/23
ATALA HSM
How do i go about this,SSL configuration on ACI
Postilion
usign ATALA HSM?
unread,
ATALA HSM
How do i go about this,SSL configuration on ACI
Postilion
usign ATALA HSM?
2/14/23
Babatunde Oyenekan
, …
murtuza chhil
4
11/29/22
Understanding Postillon's Sink and Source Node
experience with
Postilion
so here is my take on it. > > The flow is usually > external network ->source node ->
Postilion
Transaction Manager -> Sink > Node ->
unread,
Understanding Postillon's Sink and Source Node
experience with
Postilion
so here is my take on it. > > The flow is usually > external network ->source node ->
Postilion
Transaction Manager -> Sink > Node ->
11/29/22
Chandrasekhar Rout
,
murtuza chhil
3
11/15/22
java.io.EOFException getting at client end
when i run locally both client and server everything works fine . pls see below : 1. client app connected successfully. 2. client send msg server
unread,
java.io.EOFException getting at client end
when i run locally both client and server everything works fine . pls see below : 1. client app connected successfully. 2. client send msg server
11/15/22
cap10mycap10
, …
murtuza chhil
5
5/11/22
HSM Thales config
of you
postilion
messages that works. Spot the differences and fix. Or re-read the Thales spec and understand the message formats. In your CA command what made you choose 49? I understand
unread,
HSM Thales config
of you
postilion
messages that works. Spot the differences and fix. Or re-read the Thales spec and understand the message formats. In your CA command what made you choose 49? I understand
5/11/22
Mapfunde Venon
,
murtuza chhil
4
3/22/22
Packager
I am not sure what you changed but the new packager and hex dump you previously provided still don't work in the test code I had provided. There
unread,
Packager
I am not sure what you changed but the new packager and hex dump you previously provided still don't work in the test code I had provided. There
3/22/22
cap10mycap10
, …
chhil
9
12/21/21
ICCData Field 127.25
seems tatt
postilion
instance is not expectin ICCData in xml format >>>> (how you are trying to send it), but in bitmap format. >>>> >>>> Hope
unread,
ICCData Field 127.25
seems tatt
postilion
instance is not expectin ICCData in xml format >>>> (how you are trying to send it), but in bitmap format. >>>> >>>> Hope
12/21/21
cap10mycap10
, …
murtuza chhil
12
11/7/21
Problem unpacking field 127.22
Thanks @chillum@gmail.com, TransactionManager is what I am looking at right now. Still looking through the documentation to understand it. Venon
unread,
Problem unpacking field 127.22
Thanks @chillum@gmail.com, TransactionManager is what I am looking at right now. Still looking through the documentation to understand it. Venon
11/7/21
cap10mycap10
, …
murtuza chhil
4
9/10/21
Packager for Sub Fields of Subfield
in a
Postilion
ISO8583 message. ------------- Hello , anyone who can assist with how a packager that can handle this type of message: 127.022.VasApplication [vmobile-ussd] 127.022
unread,
Packager for Sub Fields of Subfield
in a
Postilion
ISO8583 message. ------------- Hello , anyone who can assist with how a packager that can handle this type of message: 127.022.VasApplication [vmobile-ussd] 127.022
9/10/21
Emmanuel Mensah
, …
Charaka Wijesinghe
3
9/1/21
ISO 8385 1993 ACTION CODE (FIELD 39)
my clients
POSTILION
>> >> 49534F383538332D31393933303231303030303030 >> >> >> >> >> >> * * >> >> >> >
unread,
ISO 8385 1993 ACTION CODE (FIELD 39)
my clients
POSTILION
>> >> 49534F383538332D31393933303231303030303030 >> >> >> >> >> >> * * >> >> >> >
9/1/21
Afoo
, …
murtuza chhil
4
7/21/21
Message length or header was not set but it was received at server side
Postilion
packager and NACChannel (2 byte length header) usually go hand in hand. What channel are you using? Make sure sender and receiver are configured to use the same channel (how
unread,
Message length or header was not set but it was received at server side
Postilion
packager and NACChannel (2 byte length header) usually go hand in hand. What channel are you using? Make sure sender and receiver are configured to use the same channel (how
7/21/21
pgu...@gmail.com
, …
Victor Salaman
5
7/7/21
JPOS Unpacking Field 127.22 From Switch - org.jpos.iso.IFA_LLLLLCHAR: Problem unpacking field 22 (org.jpos.iso.ISOException: Invalid character found. Expected digit.)
wrote the
Postilion
channel/packager in 1999, for
Postilion
3.5 ISOBridge. I can imagine much has changed since then :) If it's not too much trouble, please create a new version
unread,
JPOS Unpacking Field 127.22 From Switch - org.jpos.iso.IFA_LLLLLCHAR: Problem unpacking field 22 (org.jpos.iso.ISOException: Invalid character found. Expected digit.)
wrote the
Postilion
channel/packager in 1999, for
Postilion
3.5 ISOBridge. I can imagine much has changed since then :) If it's not too much trouble, please create a new version
7/7/21
Rosario
,
chhil
2
4/3/20
Dynamic key exchange- Postilion connecting to JPos
lets say
Postilion
. How do I implement the > reverse. Is there any development around this. Any sample code. > > Basically when
Postilion
requests for a key exchange message
unread,
Dynamic key exchange- Postilion connecting to JPos
lets say
Postilion
. How do I implement the > reverse. Is there any development around this. Any sample code. > > Basically when
Postilion
requests for a key exchange message
4/3/20
ccav tech
,
chhil
6
9/24/19
Issue while sending DE 127.10 & DE 127.29 together.
be a
Postilion
issue. I would suggest you have them look into it. Before doing that make sure you used the NACChannel to send this message so that the appropriate 2 byte length header was
unread,
Issue while sending DE 127.10 & DE 127.29 together.
be a
Postilion
issue. I would suggest you have them look into it. Before doing that make sure you used the NACChannel to send this message so that the appropriate 2 byte length header was
9/24/19
ccav tech
, …
chhil
19
9/20/19
Posting "127.010" with NACChannel
Follow this thread, it too is position related and somewhere in there there is a how to do hexdump analysis. https://groups.google.com/forum/m/?
unread,
Posting "127.010" with NACChannel
Follow this thread, it too is position related and somewhere in there there is a how to do hexdump analysis. https://groups.google.com/forum/m/?
9/20/19
ccav tech
,
chhil
6
9/19/19
Issue while setting DE 127.29
talk to
Postilion
guys. You can dump the hexdump and parse the message by hand for bitmap for field 127 and see what bits are enabled. -chhil On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:20 PM ccav tech wrote
unread,
Issue while setting DE 127.29
talk to
Postilion
guys. You can dump the hexdump and parse the message by hand for bitmap for field 127 and see what bits are enabled. -chhil On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:20 PM ccav tech wrote
9/19/19
mwyc...@gmail.com
, …
chhil
15
7/16/19
Error - org.jpos.iso.IFA_LLNUM: Problem unpacking field 2
From your
postilion
logs, field 127 starts with >>>>> >>>>> [LLVAR ans ..32 010] 127.002 [0000348641] >>>>> >>>>
unread,
Error - org.jpos.iso.IFA_LLNUM: Problem unpacking field 2
From your
postilion
logs, field 127 starts with >>>>> >>>>> [LLVAR ans ..32 010] 127.002 [0000348641] >>>>> >>>>
7/16/19
ccav tech
, …
chhil
14
7/12/19
Issue while parsing ISO 8583 Response message.
provided by
Postilion
for the interface you are connecting to and determine the channel to use. Either you will be able to pick one JPOS provides or you will need to extend JPOS' basechannel
unread,
Issue while parsing ISO 8583 Response message.
provided by
Postilion
for the interface you are connecting to and determine the channel to use. Either you will be able to pick one JPOS provides or you will need to extend JPOS' basechannel
7/12/19
Fandi Akhmad
, …
chhil
33
7/3/19
org.jpos.iso.ISOException: org.jpos.iso.IFA_LLNUM: Problem unpacking field 2
no need for StringBUilder if using Collectors.joining() public static byte[] decodeHexDump(String s) { return ISOUtil.hex2byte( Arrays.stream(s.split(
unread,
org.jpos.iso.ISOException: org.jpos.iso.IFA_LLNUM: Problem unpacking field 2
no need for StringBUilder if using Collectors.joining() public static byte[] decodeHexDump(String s) { return ISOUtil.hex2byte( Arrays.stream(s.split(
7/3/19
ccav tech
, …
Andrés Alcarraz
17
6/18/19
Getting an error while unpacking DE 12 Using Jpos 2.1.2 library
thanks Andres,its working now. On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:52 AM Andrés Alcarraz wrote: > Hi ccav > > You are not defining the bitmap subfield
unread,
Getting an error while unpacking DE 12 Using Jpos 2.1.2 library
thanks Andres,its working now. On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:52 AM Andrés Alcarraz wrote: > Hi ccav > > You are not defining the bitmap subfield
6/18/19
Mumuney Abdlquadri
, …
chhil
16
9/6/18
not receiving response for unsuccessful transactions (field 39 is non 000)
>>
postilion
8583 packager. Call it finnacle8583 or something. >>> >>> Take some hints from the sample code provided on how to use loggers and >>>
unread,
not receiving response for unsuccessful transactions (field 39 is non 000)
>>
postilion
8583 packager. Call it finnacle8583 or something. >>> >>> Take some hints from the sample code provided on how to use loggers and >>>
9/6/18
Chinyenje Kapoma
, …
chhil
11
7/28/18
Q&A
Field 127 Subfield of subfield
asked the
Postilion
side on what is wrong? >> Have you looked at your
Postilion
spec and constructed your message as >> required? >> >> You cannot put a snippet
unread,
Q&A
Field 127 Subfield of subfield
asked the
Postilion
side on what is wrong? >> Have you looked at your
Postilion
spec and constructed your message as >> required? >> >> You cannot put a snippet
7/28/18
raghu
,
Alejandro Revilla
3
5/24/18
Q&A
Sub Filed packager for DE48 : data set identifier / length indicator
integration with
Postilion
host (TermApp.ISO interface) , there is a requirement to send the DE48 sub fields in the request. I had defined the sub field packager and i am able to construct
unread,
Q&A
Sub Filed packager for DE48 : data set identifier / length indicator
integration with
Postilion
host (TermApp.ISO interface) , there is a requirement to send the DE48 sub fields in the request. I had defined the sub field packager and i am able to construct
5/24/18
netma...@gmail.com
,
chhil
2
3/1/18
Postilion Subfield 127 pack/add
ISOMsg in
postilion
format using PostPackager. While creating isomsg, getting exception while adding the field 127 as it is subfield. Below is code snippet: ISOMsg isoMsg = new ISOMsg
unread,
Postilion Subfield 127 pack/add
ISOMsg in
postilion
format using PostPackager. While creating isomsg, getting exception while adding the field 127 as it is subfield. Below is code snippet: ISOMsg isoMsg = new ISOMsg
3/1/18
Adepoju Sodiq
, …
D Rajkumar
5
2/5/18
Where are Decimalisation table and pin validation data configured?
> on
postilion
card > > On Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 11:55:22 PM UTC+1, aissa wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Run a test case with pin verification on postillon and
unread,
Where are Decimalisation table and pin validation data configured?
> on
postilion
card > > On Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 11:55:22 PM UTC+1, aissa wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Run a test case with pin verification on postillon and
2/5/18
hsampson
, …
chhil
9
12/2/17
Unable to unpack field 2 - Required 633 but just got 330 bytes
at the
Postilion
ISO specification to define your field. You can try the packagers from https://github.com/jpos/jPOS/blob/master/jpos/src/main/java/org/jpos/iso/packager
unread,
Unable to unpack field 2 - Required 633 but just got 330 bytes
at the
Postilion
ISO specification to define your field. You can try the packagers from https://github.com/jpos/jPOS/blob/master/jpos/src/main/java/org/jpos/iso/packager
12/2/17
Chatay Gür
,
chhil
13
11/30/17
Jpos Channel and Header
message (
postilion
.realtime.postbridge.Iso8583PB) could >>>> not be unpacked, because of an error while unpacking field number msg_type >>>> (Fixed
unread,
Jpos Channel and Header
message (
postilion
.realtime.postbridge.Iso8583PB) could >>>> not be unpacked, because of an error while unpacking field number msg_type >>>> (Fixed
11/30/17
miguel angel Suevis Pacheco
, …
chhil
14
11/30/17
How to use JPOS with Postilion
0800 against
postilion
we found > that the messages are arriving correctly but in field 70 it only takes 00 > instead of 001 > this could be because the size of the message in the
unread,
How to use JPOS with Postilion
0800 against
postilion
we found > that the messages are arriving correctly but in field 70 it only takes 00 > instead of 001 > this could be because the size of the message in the
11/30/17