You seem to be trying to present a *swiped* transaction where perhaps
only keyed data is available?
>
>
> By the way, what I'm trying to do is to allow end users/public use
> their ATM cards on a web based internet banking system.
How are you intending getting the card's details?
How are you getting the PIN?
Are these cash transactions? How are you dispensing the cash 8) ?
What product do the cardholders take away?
>
> This system will be linked to an ISO system.
>
> The ISO system requires track2 data but the end user can only provide
> PAN (i don't think ATM cards have exp date printed on it).
They may not, because they are intended to be read by the ATM - are they
chip cards too?
> Hmm.. any suggestions on workaround guys?
Depending on your answers to my questions above, I think you need to be
treating the transactions as keyed at an unattended terminal.
You should be capturing all the detail you can (expiry date and CVV2) at
the very least and perhaps even address details (AVS) to enhance your
chances of getting an auth that will also 'settle' which is therefore
not fraudulent and will not cause you or your company a financial loss.
I have the feeling that you are bending too many rules to be able to
make this work for you, sorry.
--
Mark
>
> Track 2 Format :
>
> Track2 = PAN+Separator+Expiry Date+ServiceCode+Pvk Index+ PVV + CVV
Not in every case I'm afraid, some tracks are a bit longer, and
everything following the service code can vary - across the schemes.
--
Mark
This could mean it is simply for use in a specific ATM and not anywhere
else?
>
> Is it purposely not printed/embossed on the card while actually the
> value can be found on the magnetic stripe in it's track2?
The card Issuer decides - within guidelines - what goes on the card and
where.
It is really a balance between making it easy for the cardholder/ATM,
whilst giving the Issuer enough detail to provide the instruction to
dispense cash with the confidence of knowing that the cardholder is the
person the card suggests they are and that the card is the one they
produced.
A card that is meant only to be inserted into an ATM - along with a PIN?
- does not need extra security.
A card that can be used under chip, keyed or acquired via an impression
needs to have more details available to the merchant/cardholder so that
they may gather the evidence needed to go to the Issuer.
It is all down to risk.
Ask yourself how certain you will be that the card number keyed in
belongs to the cardholder at your web interface?
Are you happy to take all financial losses/costs if a transaction you
acquire is fraudulent? Be certain that neither the card Issuer nor the
cardholder will accept a loss in this scenario.
--
Mark
They might not need track2 (DE35?) if they can accept a keyed style of
transaction.
They still might need more detail though to complete this flavour, which
will then depend on what is available on the card (CVV2) or from the
cardholder (Address perhaps).
--
Mark