Is JOOMMF faster than MuMax3?

[Anirban Mukhopadhyay]

Is JOOMMF faster than MuMax3?

[JOOMMF channel]

Hi Anirban,

It is very difficult to make a direct comparison, but generally speaking, MuMax3 is faster because of its GPU capabilities.

Best wishes,

Marijan

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 13:48, Anirban Mukhopadhyay <anirban.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

Is JOOMMF faster than MuMax3?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "joommf-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to joommf-users...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to joommf...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/joommf-users/020bc26b-bf55-4876-847b-67d8df874548%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Anirban Mukhopadhyay]

Thank you for your reply. I am carrying out hysteresis study for 50 nm radius Permalloy disk in Mumax3 and JOOMMF. The field range is between (-100 mT, 100 mT) and ~400 samples are taken. In JOOMMF it will take ~1100 seconds where as in MuMax3 it will take ~13 hours. From documentation and research articles I also have the idea that Mumax3 is faster. But I have observed the above mentioned incident.