classes without subpackages...

[Ian MacLennan]

Hey,

There are currently five classes that do not have subpackages: JObject,
JObservable, JObserver, JFactory and JVersion. Could these be put into
a subpackage? (maybe call it base or something similar)

This would help with the organization of the API docs.

Thanks,
Ian

[Jinx]

Hey Ian,

Oke will do :)

Johan

[Ian MacLennan]

Hi Johann,

Can you clarify what the name of this subpackage will be (suggestion:
base)? Will all of these classes be put into this subpackage?

Can you make these changes to the SVN or should we make a tracker item
for Shayne?

Hope all is well,
Ian

P.S. The affected classes are:

JObject, JObservable, JObserver, JFactory and JVersion

[Louis Landry]

I think base is a great name for it.  I would also make sure JTree and JNode are added to that subpackage as well as they fall under the same category of object.

Louis

[Ian MacLennan]

Hey,

You never mentioned how I should approach this, so I made a patch that
contains the necessary changes to the 5106 version... If someone can
make these changes it would be great!

It just changes the subpackage of the following classes:
JObject
JObserver
JObservable
JTree
JNode
JFactory
JVersion

Ian

Louis Landry wrote:
> I think base is a great name for it. I would also make sure JTree and
> JNode are added to that subpackage as well as they fall under the same
> category of object.
>
> Louis
>

> On 9/20/06, *Ian MacLennan* <joo...@ianmaclennan.org