Stb Emulator Pro Cracked Iphone
Levi Satterley
For my development process it would be ideal if I could start my Cordova app directly from the command line and have it load into a specified emulator. I can do this by running the following from the project root directory:
Besides this simulated device, I would also like to test on (for instance) an iPad. I have these emulation images installed, and I can start my app in them manually in Xcode. Also, the command list-emulator-images (located in project_dir/platforms/ios/cordova/lib) gives the following output:
However, the thing is: I can't seem to figure out how to start the emulator in anything other than the default (which appears to be the iPhone Retina (4-inch) emulation image). The relevant output of cordova help gives the following information:
The documentation for the command-line tool doesn't offer any information in this regard, and an extensive Google-search also failed to turn up anything. Am I missing something trivial? Or am I trying to do something weird? I really hope someone here has experience with this, and can provide some answers.
Old thread, I know, but it seems, perhaps, that the answer has changed slightly. The hints from earlier posts in this thread helped, but so did reading the documentation included in the code, /platforms/ios/cordova/lib/run.js
Execute ./platforms/ios/cordova/lib/list-emulator-images to list the available emulator images. Do not include the version number on the end when making the cordova call to run in the desired emulator.
Runs iOS simulator with web request based on already generated build for cordova application. Execute this request from browser opens simulator on mac with iPhone 8Plus version: :3000/cordova/build/[xxxx-buildnumber]/emulate?target=iPhone-8-Plus
Android emulator, on the other hand, uses QEMU to run ARM (or x86, but ARM is more popular) CPU virtual machine, with all the software stack on top of it - Linux kernel, Android system image, etc. Think of it as an emulated hardware.
It's a sort of trade off - the way iOS does it is much faster, but it is harder to make it 100% compatible with the target system. For Apple it was perhaps a bit simpler, as iOS and Mac OS have many things in common.
For Android it makes a lot of sense to emulate the whole stack - it is easier to build cross-platform SDK, easier to test some system level components with it, etc. It's simply a different ecosystem, with different goals. Don't forget, that Android emulator can be used e.g. to test native ARM libraries compiled with Android NDK.
Today the Android emulator performance is more or less acceptable, but it was just a disaster in the early Android days. That said, personally I think that fast, API-level native simulator for Android would be a great addition to the SDK, making it possible to test less demanding projects much faster.
Apple Simulator is created using system configuration means it will take the System's ram, memory,cache automatically you don't have to configure it, so an Iphone Simulator is not act as real device but in case of Android one has to provide all the configuration details before creating the emulator,Android emulator to a great extent will act as real device but can be much slower than an Iphone Simulator.
First of all Android does not have a Simulator it has an Emulator.Secondly I believe the speed of the Emulator depends on your machine config. Better the config the better it will run provided you have created the AVD properly and given it ample memory.
A simulator behaves similar to something else, but is implemented in an entirely different way. It provides the basic behavior of a system but may not necessarily abide by all of the rules of the system being simulated. It is there to give you an idea about how something works. It uses Desktop resources like processor, ram etc.,
An emulator is a system that behaves exactly like something else, and abides by all of the rules of the system being emulated. It is effectively a complete replication of another system, right down to being binary compatible with the emulated system's inputs and outputs, but operating in a different environment to the environment of the original emulated system.
The Android simulator is actually an emulator, designed to mimic a mobile device running Android, meaning it emulates the hardware running Android OS, to make it as close to 100% identical as possible. The JVM converts Java bytecode into ARM instructions that are decoded by the emulator.
The iOS simulator works at a higher level, simulating the operating system and its libraries, translating OS calls into OS X implementations and simulating events in the other direction like device rotation or low memory conditions. When you run an app on the iOS simulator, the app is compiled into x86 that runs natively on your Mac. Unlike the Android emulator, your iOS app won't run out of memory in the simulator because it's not constrained to any particular iOS device's memory limitations.
My home Internet is down and I need to run some tests on my Android emulator. My MacBook Pro is connected to the Internet via my iPhone Hotspot using bluetooth. Connection is ok - not super fast. The Android emulator is running on my MacBook Pro. Unfortunately emulator cannot connect to Internet. Any tips on how I can get the emulator to detect the internet connection?
I am writing a simple Flutter app on Windows using Android Studio. I am able to test my app on Android emulators well but I can't seem to figure how to add an iOS emulator to AVD manager nor connect to my Mac Pro and deploy to iPhone/iPad. Is that even possible? I do have a Mac Pro with Xcode installed and connected to an iPad.
Anyway while I'm at it I wonder if it'd be nice to have this embedded into an AUv3 too. I wonder what I could do to make it nicer as an instrument (or effect? are there?) in an AUv3 context. It could even be something like a sample player that works via load states and play/pause.
@wahnfrieden said:
I'm porting a GB/GBC/GBA/NDS emulator wrapped into SwiftUI for Japanese (and soon other) language learning purposes, with stuff like realtime OCR of text on screen and vocab lookups.
Got the rg35xx h in a massive sale. It's great I mostly wanted to play Pico 8 and all the new indie Gameboy games and it's awesome for that. It's becoming a bit overwhelming though. So much to tinker with!!!
Of course I always praise Reelbus, and I've heard about Flytape but never dove into it. What I'm looking for are emulators I can slap on the master buss (not all at once though lol) that can emulate a ratty old cassette tape/reel-to-reel tape. Is Reelbus the best there is? Which do you prefer?
There is Caelum Tap Pro, but I cannot recommend it until they address a very serious audio glitch issue with it first, which I've repeatedly raised with them and it still remains unaddressed. If I recall correctly, it's on their list of things to fix.
Nice! I'll be sure to check those out for my next live Ambient piece. I just finished one with Chow Tape on the master buss, lol. The audio sounds so pleasingly degraded. But Chow Tape can be pushed to extremes very, VERY quickly, and if that's what you're after, by all means.
@NeuM said:
There is Caelum Tap Pro, but I cannot recommend it until they address a very serious audio glitch issue with it first, which I've repeatedly raised with them and it still remains unaddressed. If I recall correctly, it's on their list of things to fix.
No kidding. The best way to emulate tape saturation is to record the output of an iPad onto a physical reel-to-reel analogue tape and record it back into the iPad. But who has money and space for that? (Maybe Brian Eno, but he's not mortal, so he doesn't count lol.)
Ah now I see. It has that wicked Pultec emulation in it, and I do love me a good Pultec sometimes. (Although I rarely EQ my sounds when I produce Ambient, just sticking to a simple high-pass filter on most sounds in a mix, lol.)
@jwmmakerofmusic said:
Of course I always praise Reelbus, and I've heard about Flytape but never dove into it. What I'm looking for are emulators I can slap on the master buss (not all at once though lol) that can emulate a ratty old cassette tape/reel-to-reel tape. Is Reelbus the best there is? Which do you prefer?
After buying the apps I didn't yet buy, redownloading the ones I didn't redownload yet, and testing those and the ones I already have, I have reached a personal opinion: Reelbus and Chowtape are my two favourites. If I want to add a bit of subtle flavour and character to the master buss, that's Reelbus. If I want the master buss to sound like it was recorded on a dodgy old cassette, Chow Tape. Chow Tape is what I used on "My Mellow was Harshed", and it sounds glorious!
@jwmmakerofmusic said:
After buying the apps I didn't yet buy, redownloading the ones I didn't redownload yet, and testing those and the ones I already have, I have reached a personal opinion: Reelbus and Chowtape are my two favourites. If I want to add a bit of subtle flavour and character to the master buss, that's Reelbus. If I want the master buss to sound like it was recorded on a dodgy old cassette, Chow Tape. Chow Tape is what I used on "My Mellow was Harshed", and it sounds glorious!