Looking for XML report format that supports multiple iterations per test

14 views
Skip to first unread message

bl0ck3r

unread,
May 23, 2013, 8:09:33 PM5/23/13
to jenkins...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

I am looking for any XML report format publishable by Jenkins, that is able to report multiple iterations of the same test when the same test is executed with different random seeds. I am NOT looking for a test framework, nor a test runner. I am only looking for a test report format digestible by Jenkins for writing custom test results myself. I already use JUnit XML, but it is limited to the "package.class.testname" hierarchy, and does not appear to support multiple iterations of the same test with different seeds.

Any pointers?
Thanks.

Mark Waite

unread,
May 23, 2013, 9:29:31 PM5/23/13
to jenkins...@googlegroups.com
The NUnit framework supports that type of execution (http://nunit.org/?p=testCase&r=2.5.5), so you might try the NUnit plugin to see if its format meets your need.

Mark Waite


From: bl0ck3r <martin....@gmail.com>
To: jenkins...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:09 PM
Subject: Looking for XML report format that supports multiple iterations per test

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-use...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 


bl0ck3r

unread,
May 24, 2013, 9:55:53 AM5/24/13
to jenkins...@googlegroups.com, Mark Waite
I am looking at the NUnit samples, but I don't find an example of how to write a test report.

However, I have noticed the following with JUnix XML in Jenkins: if there are two identical tests in the test suite, Jenkins reports them separately:

<testsuite name="TestsuiteName1">
  <testcase classname="Package1.Class1" name="Test1" time="4" seed="3"></testcase>
  <testcase classname="Package1.Class1" name="Test1" time="5" seed="9"></testcase>
</testsuite>

I wonder if this would work, or if it would silently break something else?
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages