Matrix job

32 views
Skip to first unread message

Jeff MAURY

unread,
Feb 2, 2015, 7:45:51 AM2/2/15
to jenkins...@googlegroups.com
I have a matrix job with 2 axis (JDK + Eclipse version). It appears that I have a lot of false negative builds, mainly due to load or problems with UI emulation. Is there a way to get the number of failed jobs in the mail generated ?

Thanks
Jeff

Baptiste Mathus

unread,
Feb 2, 2015, 7:52:16 AM2/2/15
to jenkins...@googlegroups.com
Hi Jeff,

I guess that using a system groovy script step could help you get something like that.

But I'm not sure to understand what you want, what is the "number of failed jobs" you want? You mean amonst the total jobs according to the combinatorials of the axis? 

Cheers

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-use...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/21f6fd1c-fd4b-4fe1-b7bf-2278aa8f9016%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
Sauvez un arbre,
Mangez un castor !

Jeff MAURY

unread,
Feb 2, 2015, 8:17:44 AM2/2/15
to jenkins...@googlegroups.com, bma...@batmat.net


Le lundi 2 février 2015 13:52:16 UTC+1, Baptiste Mathus a écrit :
Hi Jeff,

I guess that using a system groovy script step could help you get something like that.

But I'm not sure to understand what you want, what is the "number of failed jobs" you want? You mean amonst the total jobs according to the combinatorials of the axis? 
Yes, you got it !!!!

Jeff 

Baptiste Mathus

unread,
Feb 3, 2015, 12:05:07 PM2/3/15
to jenkins...@googlegroups.com

Not really an answer yet, but just a quick thought: might be you want to have a look at the workflow plugin.
IIRC there's no specific DSL yet for matrix builds, but doing through two groovy needed loops (for your axis)+the 'parallel' keyword you may be able to achieve what you'd like in less time and maybe in a slightly less hacky way?

Cheers

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages