[JIRA] [gui] (JENKINS-24749) please change the font back - the helvetica font is messing up the whole gui under folders

51 views
Skip to first unread message

funeeldy@yahoo.com (JIRA)

unread,
Sep 17, 2014, 4:28:35 PM9/17/14
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Issue Type: Improvement Improvement
Assignee: Unassigned
Components: gui
Created: 17/Sep/14 8:28 PM
Description:

The latest version of Jenkins has a Helvetica font and no way to resize the columns or delete columns inside of folders. it is displaying my job names in a very narrow column. I can shrink the whole window with ctrl -, but then things are too small to read. Not sure why you changed the default font, but it was fine before.

Environment: windows
Project: Jenkins
Priority: Major Major
Reporter: marlene cote
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

daniel@beckweb.net (JIRA)

unread,
Sep 18, 2014, 1:08:25 PM9/18/14
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Daniel Beck resolved Improvement JENKINS-24749 as Won't Fix

A lot more than font was changed, so this may be incidental.

If you're referring to Cloudbees Folders Plugin, create a new view (e.g. List View with regexp pattern .*, configure columns, then go in folder configuration, set that as default view, and then you can delete the previous default 'All' View.

Change By: Daniel Beck (18/Sep/14 4:47 PM)
Status: Open Resolved
Resolution: Won't Fix

daniel@beckweb.net (JIRA)

unread,
Sep 18, 2014, 1:08:25 PM9/18/14
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Daniel Beck commented on Improvement JENKINS-24749

Screenshots would help, by the way. Also, what screen resolution is this? Are only folders affected, or the regular 'All' view outside folders as well?

drdt@gweep.net (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 6, 2015, 12:14:52 PM1/6/15
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Don Ross commented on Improvement JENKINS-24749

I am with Marlene. The new look is clunky and the automatic window/column sizings don't appear to have been updated to match the new widths. I will attach screenshots.

However, according to the original ticket, the change was made to the 'default font'. So, if someone can point me to instructions for overriding the default to set my deployment back to the view my users are used to, I will be on my way.

drdt@gweep.net (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 6, 2015, 12:36:53 PM1/6/15
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

The left-side picture is the new user interface; the right side is the old. These are taken from identically-sized windows.

As you can see, two visible problems:

  • the navigation bar takes up much more of the screen, leaving less room for the useful information.
  • the build history window is formatted weirdly.
    Plus, my users and I think it looks ugly.

I am using narrow windows to illustrate the problem, but the build history window gets screwed up in almost every screen size.

Change By: Don Ross (06/Jan/15 5:36 PM)
Attachment: jenkins-ui-comparison.gif

daniel@beckweb.net (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 6, 2015, 12:40:52 PM1/6/15
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Daniel Beck commented on Improvement JENKINS-24749

What version of Jenkins is this? Try the current release.

drdt@gweep.net (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 6, 2015, 12:40:55 PM1/6/15
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
 
Don Ross edited a comment on Improvement JENKINS-24749

The left-side picture is the new user interface; the right side is the old. These are taken from identically-sized windows.

As you can see, two visible problems:

  • the navigation bar takes up much more of the screen, leaving less room for the useful information.
  • the build history window is formatted weirdly.

Plus, my users (and I) think it looks ugly.

I am using narrow windows to illustrate the problem, but the build history window gets screwed up in almost every screen size (including maximized). If I make the window narrow enough, the build history panel expands to fill the entire window, pushing the job details off the bottom of the screen.

drdt@gweep.net (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 6, 2015, 12:44:52 PM1/6/15
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Don Ross commented on Improvement JENKINS-24749

This is 1.580.1 (the long-term stable release at the time we started our testing). Do you think these issues might be resolved in 1.580.2?

daniel@beckweb.net (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 6, 2015, 1:55:52 PM1/6/15
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Daniel Beck commented on Improvement JENKINS-24749

There were changes since then to how the build history looks, and adapts to longer text in the description, build name, and/or badges, which were long-standing problems (screen shots e.g. on https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/1470).

I don't think these are eligible for LTS backport though (even if -IRC- long build names or badges don't break and overlap the main panel). You'll need for the next major LTS.1 release that should arrive in February.

drdt@gweep.net (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 6, 2015, 2:01:53 PM1/6/15
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Don Ross commented on Improvement JENKINS-24749

> A lot more than font was changed, so this may be incidental.

The font change was not incidental; it was filed as a specific issue (JENKINS-23840) separate from the other UI changes. The change submitter also specifically increased the font size.

It appears, however, that Marlene's and my complaints about the formatting of columns are not related to the font change, but rather to the UI redesign, probably pull request 1310, which changed the way tables are rendered.

drdt@gweep.net (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 6, 2015, 2:01:55 PM1/6/15
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Don Ross commented on Improvement JENKINS-24749

Thanks, Dan, for that good info. I'll recommend we hold off on our upgrade until February.

daniel@beckweb.net (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 6, 2015, 2:10:53 PM1/6/15
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Daniel Beck commented on Improvement JENKINS-24749

The font change was not incidental; it was filed as a specific issue

Right, I meant that the layout issue may not be a direct result of the font changes only, but rather interaction of font change and layout change, or layout change only. They were both merged into the same release IIRC.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages