[JIRA] (JENKINS-61515) Git SCM polling fails with skipDefaultCheckout() in pipeline

32 views
Skip to first unread message

matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 18, 2020, 4:41:04 PM3/18/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Matt G created an issue
 
Jenkins / Bug JENKINS-61515
Git SCM polling fails with skipDefaultCheckout() in pipeline
Issue Type: Bug Bug
Assignee: Mark Waite
Components: git-plugin
Created: 2020-03-18 20:40
Environment: latest production version of Jenkins & all plugins. Running on Linux (SLES) server.
Priority: Major Major
Reporter: Matt G

In job's pipeline, I have the following:

 

options { skipDefaultCheckout() }

 

Git SCM polling never finds any changes for the repository. Same job, but without skipDefaultCheckout() in the pipeline causes Git polling to work as expected.

Add Comment Add Comment
 
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.12#713012-sha1:6e07c38)
Atlassian logo

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 18, 2020, 5:38:02 PM3/18/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Mark Waite updated an issue
Change By: Mark Waite
Component/s: workflow-scm-step-plugin
Component/s: git-plugin

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 18, 2020, 5:38:02 PM3/18/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Mark Waite commented on Bug JENKINS-61515
 
Re: Git SCM polling fails with skipDefaultCheckout() in pipeline

Which type of Pipeline job is it?

  • Pipeline job that defines the Pipeline in the job definition
  • Pipeline job that gets the job definition from SCM
  • Pipeline job defined by multibranch pipeline
  • Pipeline job defined by an organization folder

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 18, 2020, 5:39:03 PM3/18/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Mark Waite assigned an issue to Unassigned
 
Change By: Mark Waite
Assignee: Mark Waite

matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 18, 2020, 5:49:02 PM3/18/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
  • Pipeline job that gets the job definition from SCM

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 18, 2020, 6:44:02 PM3/18/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

I can't duplicate the issue. Steps I took to try to duplicate the problem:

  1. Define a pipeline job JENKINS-61515-using-JENKINS-26100-repo as a Pipeline job that reads its definition from SCM with 'Poll SCM' configured with no schedule so that it will respond to notifyCommit but not perform polls itself
  2. Run the pipeline job once
  3. Commit a change to the branch monitored by that job
  4. Invoke the notifyCommit to cause the job to poll, confirm the job detects the change and runs
  5. Commit a change to the branch monitored by that job
  6. Press the 'Poll Now' button on the job definition (provided by the Poll Now plugin), confirm the job detects the change and runs

I'll need more details to duplicate the issue. You could upload the job definition XML file or could compare your job definition with my job definition and describe the differences in detail.

matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 30, 2020, 3:48:05 PM3/30/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Matt G commented on Bug JENKINS-61515

In #1, I set it up with a regular (1 minute) polling interval. Then I built the project manually by clicking 'Build now'. I did not use notifyCommit or 'Poll Now'. New changes pushed to the repository never get detected. The polling log timestamps do update, but it never executes any Git commands; it just says no changes detected.

matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 30, 2020, 4:01:03 PM3/30/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Matt G updated an issue
 
Change By: Matt G
Attachment: config.xml
Attachment: Jenkinsfile

matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 30, 2020, 4:02:02 PM3/30/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Matt G edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-61515
In #1, I set it up with a regular (1 minute) polling interval. Then I built the project manually by clicking 'Build now'. I did not use notifyCommit or 'Poll Now'. New changes pushed to the repository never get detected. The polling log timestamps do update, but it never executes any Git commands; it just says no changes detected. I've attached the relevant config.xml for the job and the Jenkinsfile from the repository in question so you can see exactly how it is set up to reproduce the issue.

matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 30, 2020, 4:03:02 PM3/30/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Matt G commented on Bug JENKINS-61515

This is what the polling log looks like, even when I know new changes were pushed to the repository:

Started on Mar 30, 2020, 12:57:00 PM
Done. Took 1 ms
No changes

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 1, 2020, 8:08:04 PM4/1/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Mark Waite edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-61515
I'm unable to duplicate the problem, even with your config.xml file.

I compared the config.xml you uploaded with the config.xml of my test job.  The differences included:

* Your config.xml polls every minute.  Mine is configured with polling but with no schedule so that the job will respond to notifyCommit without wasting the effort polling
* Your config.xml file is XML 1.0, mine is 1.1.  That difference should be irrelevant
* Your config.xml references /path/to/my/repository.git.  My config.xml references https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins.bugs.  I'm using a network based git server and I assume you are also using a network based git server.  If instead you are using file system access and a git server that is on the same computer as your Jenkins server, you might try using a network protocol to access the git repository rather than file system access.  I rarely test direct file system access to git repositories because it would limit jobs to only run on the master

Based on the differences between my config.xml and yours, I configured my job to poll every minute.  I committed a change to the repository, waited one minute, and confirmed that the change was detected and the job ran.  I committed two changes to the repository, waited for the next polling, and confirmed that the changes were detected and the job ran.  I committed three changes to the repository, waited for the next poll, and confirmed the changes were detected.

I also confirmed that if I use a notifyCommit hook in the central git repository to alert the Jenkins server that it should poll, the changes are detected as soon as they are applied, without the overhead of polling once a minute.  My central git repository is a small computer hosting ssh based git repositories.  In the {{hooks}} directory of that repository, I have an executable script named {{post-receive}} like this:

{noformat}
I #!/bin/bash

curl -s http://mark-pc2.markwaite.net/git/notifyCommit?url=https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs
{noformat}

That script is automatically executed by git each time a commit arrives at that repository.  That script is an example of the concept that Kohsuke Kawaguchi described in his blog post, "[polling must die|https://kohsuke.org/2011/12/01/polling-must-die-triggering-jenkins-builds-from-a-git-hook/]".  It may be worth experimenting with notifyCommit to avoid the overhead of polling and the delay of polling.  

Alternately, if you're using a git hosting system like GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, or Gitea, they offer web hooks which can do the same thing.  The web hooks are often managed by Jenkins plugins focused on the specific provider.

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 1, 2020, 8:08:04 PM4/1/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

I'm unable to duplicate the problem, even with your config.xml file.

I compared the config.xml you uploaded with the config.xml of my test job. The differences included:

  • Your config.xml polls every minute. Mine is configured with polling but with no schedule so that the job will respond to notifyCommit without wasting the effort polling
  • Your config.xml file is XML 1.0, mine is 1.1. That difference should be irrelevant
  • Your config.xml references /path/to/my/repository.git. My config.xml references https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins.bugs. I'm using a network based git server and I assume you are also using a network based git server. If instead you are using file system access and a git server that is on the same computer as your Jenkins server, you might try using a network protocol to access the git repository rather than file system access. I rarely test direct file system access to git repositories because it would limit jobs to only run on the master

Based on the differences between my config.xml and yours, I configured my job to poll every minute. I committed a change to the repository, waited one minute, and confirmed that the change was detected and the job ran. I committed two changes to the repository, waited for the next polling, and confirmed that the changes were detected and the job ran. I committed three changes to the repository, waited for the next poll, and confirmed the changes were detected.

I also confirmed that if I use a notifyCommit hook in the central git repository to alert the Jenkins server that it should poll, the changes are detected as soon as they are applied, without the overhead of polling once a minute. My central git repository is a small computer hosting ssh based git repositories. In the hooks directory of that repository, I have an executable script named post-receive like this:

That script is automatically executed by git each time a commit arrives at that repository. That script is an example of the concept that Kohsuke Kawaguchi described in his blog post, "polling must die". It may be worth experimenting with notifyCommit to avoid the overhead of polling and the delay of polling.

Alternately, if you're using a git hosting system like GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, or Gitea, they offer web hooks which can do the same thing. The web hooks are often managed by Jenkins plugins focused on the specific provider.

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 1, 2020, 8:13:03 PM4/1/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Mark Waite edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-61515
I'm unable to duplicate the problem, even with your config.xml file.

I compared the config.xml you uploaded with the config.xml of my test job.  The differences included:

* Your config.xml polls every minute.  Mine is configured with polling but with no schedule so that the job will respond to notifyCommit without wasting the effort polling
* Your config.xml file is XML 1.0, mine is 1.1.  That difference should be irrelevant
* Your config.xml references /path/to/my/repository.git.  My config.xml references https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins.bugs.  I'm using a network based git server and I assume you are also using a network based git server.  If instead you are using file system access and a git server that is on the same computer as your Jenkins server, you might try using a network protocol to access the git repository rather than file system access.  I rarely test direct file system access to git repositories because it would limit jobs to only run on the master


Based on the differences between my config.xml and yours, I configured my job to poll every minute.  I committed a change to the repository, waited one minute, and confirmed that the change was detected and the job ran.  I committed two changes to the repository, waited for the next polling, and confirmed that the changes were detected and the job ran.  I committed three changes to the repository, waited for the next poll, and confirmed the changes were detected.

I also confirmed that if I use a notifyCommit hook in the central git repository to alert the Jenkins server that it should poll, the changes are detected as soon as they are applied, without the overhead of polling once a minute.  My central git repository is a small computer hosting ssh based git repositories.  In the {{hooks}} directory of that repository, I have an executable script named {{post-receive}} like this:

{noformat}
{noformat}

That script is automatically executed by git each time a commit arrives at that repository.  That script is an example of the concept that Kohsuke Kawaguchi described in his blog post, "[polling must die|https://kohsuke.org/2011/12/01/polling-must-die-triggering-jenkins-builds-from-a-git-hook/]".  It may be worth experimenting with notifyCommit to avoid the overhead of polling and the delay of polling.  


Alternately, if you're using a git hosting system like GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, or Gitea, they offer web hooks which can do the same thing.  The web hooks are often managed by Jenkins plugins focused on the specific provider.


There is another possible difference between the job you're running and the job that I'm running.  My Jenkinsfile is probably different from yours.  I would hope that whatever differences there are between those two files, they would be irrelevant to this case.  However, you might experiment with a variant of [my Jenkinsfile|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs/blob/JENKINS-26100-declarative-skipDefaultCheckout/Jenkinsfile] in your environment, just to see if the contents of my Jenkinsfile make polling work, while yours does not.

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 1, 2020, 8:15:02 PM4/1/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Mark Waite edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-61515
I'm unable to duplicate the problem, even with your config.xml file.

I compared the config.xml you uploaded with the [ config.xml of my test job |https://github . com/MarkEWaite/docker-lfs/blob/lts-with-plugins/ref/jobs/Bugs-Individual/jobs/JENKINS-61515-using-JENKINS-26100-repo/config.xml].   The differences included:


* Your config.xml polls every minute.  Mine is configured with polling but with no schedule so that the job will respond to notifyCommit without wasting the effort polling
* Your config.xml file is XML 1.0, mine is 1.1.  That difference should be irrelevant
* Your config.xml references /path/to/my/repository.git.  My config.xml references [my bug check repository| https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins . - bugs /tree/JENKINS-26100-declarative-skipDefaultCheckout] .  I'm using a network based git server and I assume you are also using a network based git server.  If instead you are using file system access and a git server that is on the same computer as your Jenkins server, you might try using a network protocol to access the git repository rather than file system access.  I rarely test direct file system access to git repositories because it would limit jobs to only run on the master


Based on the differences between my config.xml and yours, I configured my job to poll every minute.  I committed a change to the repository, waited one minute, and confirmed that the change was detected and the job ran.  I committed two changes to the repository, waited for the next polling, and confirmed that the changes were detected and the job ran.  I committed three changes to the repository, waited for the next poll, and confirmed the changes were detected.

I also confirmed that if I use a notifyCommit hook in the central git repository to alert the Jenkins server that it should poll, the changes are detected as soon as they are applied, without the overhead of polling once a minute.  My central git repository is a small computer hosting ssh based git repositories.  In the {{hooks}} directory of that repository, I have an executable script named {{post-receive}} like this:

{noformat}
#!/bin/bash

curl -s http://mark-pc2.markwaite.net/git/notifyCommit?url=https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs
{noformat}

That script is automatically executed by git each time a commit arrives at that repository.  That script is an example of the concept that Kohsuke Kawaguchi described in his blog post, "[polling must die|https://kohsuke.org/2011/12/01/polling-must-die-triggering-jenkins-builds-from-a-git-hook/]".  It may be worth experimenting with notifyCommit to avoid the overhead of polling and the delay of polling.  

Alternately, if you're using a git hosting system like GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, or Gitea, they offer web hooks which can do the same thing.  The web hooks are often managed by Jenkins plugins focused on the specific provider.

There is another possible difference between the job you're running and the job that I'm running.  My Jenkinsfile is probably different from yours.  I would hope that whatever differences there are between those two files, they would be irrelevant to this case.  However, you might experiment with a variant of [my Jenkinsfile|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs/blob/JENKINS-26100-declarative-skipDefaultCheckout/Jenkinsfile] in your environment, just to see if the contents of my Jenkinsfile make polling work, while yours does not.

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 1, 2020, 8:16:04 PM4/1/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Mark Waite edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-61515
I'm unable to duplicate the problem, even with your config.xml file.

I compared the   [^ config.xml ] you uploaded with the [config.xml of my test job|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/docker-lfs/blob/lts-with-plugins/ref/jobs/Bugs-Individual/jobs/JENKINS-61515-using-JENKINS-26100-repo/config.xml].  The differences included:


* Your config.xml polls every minute.  Mine is configured with polling but with no schedule so that the job will respond to notifyCommit without wasting the effort polling
* Your config.xml file is XML 1.0, mine is 1.1.  That difference should be irrelevant
* Your config.xml references /path/to/my/repository.git.  My config.xml references [my bug check repository|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs/tree/JENKINS-26100-declarative-skipDefaultCheckout].  I'm using a network based git server and I assume you are also using a network based git server.  If instead you are using file system access and a git server that is on the same computer as your Jenkins server, you might try using a network protocol to access the git repository rather than file system access.  I rarely test direct file system access to git repositories because it would limit jobs to only run on the master


Based on the differences between my config.xml and yours, I configured my job to poll every minute.  I committed a change to the repository, waited one minute, and confirmed that the change was detected and the job ran.  I committed two changes to the repository, waited for the next polling, and confirmed that the changes were detected and the job ran.  I committed three changes to the repository, waited for the next poll, and confirmed the changes were detected.

I also confirmed that if I use a notifyCommit hook in the central git repository to alert the Jenkins server that it should poll, the changes are detected as soon as they are applied, without the overhead of polling once a minute.  My central git repository is a small computer hosting ssh based git repositories.  In the {{hooks}} directory of that repository, I have an executable script named {{post-receive}} like this:

{noformat}
#!/bin/bash

curl -s http://mark-pc2.markwaite.net/git/notifyCommit?url=https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs
{noformat}

That script is automatically executed by git each time a commit arrives at that repository.  That script is an example of the concept that Kohsuke Kawaguchi described in his blog post, "[polling must die|https://kohsuke.org/2011/12/01/polling-must-die-triggering-jenkins-builds-from-a-git-hook/]".  It may be worth experimenting with notifyCommit to avoid the overhead of polling and the delay of polling.  

Alternately, if you're using a git hosting system like GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, or Gitea, they offer web hooks which can do the same thing.  The web hooks are often managed by Jenkins plugins focused on the specific provider.

There is another possible difference between the job you're running and the job that I'm running.  My Jenkinsfile is probably different from yours.  I would hope that whatever differences there are between those two files, they would be irrelevant to this case.  However, you might experiment with a variant of [my Jenkinsfile|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs/blob/JENKINS-26100-declarative-skipDefaultCheckout/Jenkinsfile] in your environment, just to see if the contents of my Jenkinsfile make polling work, while yours does not.

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 1, 2020, 8:17:02 PM4/1/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Mark Waite edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-61515
I'm unable to duplicate the problem, even with your config.xml file.

I compared the  [^config.xml]  you uploaded with the [config.xml of my test job|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/docker-lfs/blob/lts-with-plugins/ref/jobs/Bugs-Individual/jobs/JENKINS-61515-using-JENKINS-26100-repo/config.xml].  The differences included:


* Your config.xml polls every minute.  Mine is configured with polling but with no schedule so that the job will respond to notifyCommit without wasting the effort polling
* Your config.xml file is XML 1.0, mine is 1.1.  That difference should be irrelevant
* Your config.xml references /path/to/my/repository.git.  My config.xml references [my bug check repository|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs/tree/JENKINS-26100-declarative-skipDefaultCheckout].  I'm using a network based git server and I assume you are also using a network based git server.  If instead you are using file system access and to a git server that is repository on the same computer as your Jenkins server, you might try using a network protocol to access the git repository rather than file system access.  I rarely test direct file system access to git repositories because it would limit jobs to only run on the master


Based on the differences between my config.xml and yours, I configured my job to poll every minute.  I committed a change to the repository, waited one minute, and confirmed that the change was detected and the job ran.  I committed two changes to the repository, waited for the next polling, and confirmed that the changes were detected and the job ran.  I committed three changes to the repository, waited for the next poll, and confirmed the changes were detected.

I also confirmed that if I use a notifyCommit hook in the central git repository to alert the Jenkins server that it should poll, the changes are detected as soon as they are applied, without the overhead of polling once a minute.  My central git repository is a small computer hosting ssh based git repositories.  In the {{hooks}} directory of that repository, I have an executable script named {{post-receive}} like this:

{noformat}
#!/bin/bash

curl -s http://mark-pc2.markwaite.net/git/notifyCommit?url=https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs
{noformat}

That script is automatically executed by git each time a commit arrives at that repository.  That script is an example of the concept that Kohsuke Kawaguchi described in his blog post, "[polling must die|https://kohsuke.org/2011/12/01/polling-must-die-triggering-jenkins-builds-from-a-git-hook/]".  It may be worth experimenting with notifyCommit to avoid the overhead of polling and the delay of polling.  

Alternately, if you're using a git hosting system like GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, or Gitea, they offer web hooks which can do the same thing.  The web hooks are often managed by Jenkins plugins focused on the specific provider.

There is another possible difference between the job you're running and the job that I'm running.  My Jenkinsfile is probably different from yours.  I would hope that whatever differences there are between those two files, they would be irrelevant to this case.  However, you might experiment with a variant of [my Jenkinsfile|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs/blob/JENKINS-26100-declarative-skipDefaultCheckout/Jenkinsfile] in your environment, just to see if the contents of my Jenkinsfile make polling work, while yours does not.

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 1, 2020, 8:18:02 PM4/1/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Mark Waite edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-61515
I'm unable to duplicate the problem, even with your config.xml file.

I compared the  [^config.xml]  you uploaded with the [config.xml of my test job|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/docker-lfs/blob/lts-with-plugins/ref/jobs/Bugs-Individual/jobs/JENKINS-61515-using-JENKINS-26100-repo/config.xml].  The differences included:

* Your config.xml polls every minute.  Mine is configured with polling but with no schedule so that the job will respond to notifyCommit without wasting the effort polling
* Your config.xml file is XML 1.0, mine is 1.1.  That difference should be irrelevant
* Your config.xml references /path/to/my/repository.git.  My config.xml references [my bug check repository|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs/tree/JENKINS-26100-declarative-skipDefaultCheckout].  I'm using a network based git server and I assume you are also using a network based git server.  If instead you are using file system access to a repository on your Jenkins server, you might try using a network protocol to access the git repository rather than file system access.  I rarely test direct file system access to git repositories because it would limit jobs to only run on the master


Based on the differences between my config.xml and yours, I configured my job to poll every minute.  I committed a change to the repository, waited one minute, and confirmed that the change was detected and the job ran.  I committed two changes to the repository, waited for the next polling, and confirmed that the changes were detected and the job ran.  I committed three changes to the repository, waited for the next poll, and confirmed the changes were detected.

I also confirmed that if I use a notifyCommit hook in the central git repository to alert the Jenkins server that it should poll, the changes are detected as soon as they are applied, without the overhead of polling once a minute.  My central git repository is a small computer hosting ssh based git repositories.  In the {{hooks}} directory of that repository, I have an executable script named {{post-receive}} like this:

{noformat}
#!/bin/bash

curl -s http://mark-pc2.markwaite.net/git/notifyCommit?url=https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs
{noformat}

That script is automatically executed by git each time a commit arrives at that repository.  That script is an example of the concept that Kohsuke Kawaguchi described in his blog post, "[polling must die|https://kohsuke.org/2011/12/01/polling-must-die-triggering-jenkins-builds-from-a-git-hook/]".  It may be worth experimenting with notifyCommit to avoid the overhead of polling and the delay of polling.  

Alternately, if you're using a git hosting system like GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, or Gitea, they offer web hooks which can do the same thing.  The web hooks are often managed by Jenkins plugins focused on the specific provider.

There is another possible difference between the job you're running and the job that I'm running.   [   My Jenkinsfile |https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs/blob/JENKINS-26100-declarative-skipDefaultCheckout/Jenkinsfile] is probably different from yours.  I would hope that whatever differences there are between those two files, they would be irrelevant to this case.  However, you might experiment with a variant of [my Jenkinsfile|https://github.com/MarkEWaite/jenkins-bugs/blob/JENKINS-26100-declarative-skipDefaultCheckout/Jenkinsfile] in your environment, just to see if the contents of my Jenkinsfile make polling work, while yours does not.

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
May 6, 2020, 1:51:02 PM5/6/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Matt G any more information you can share that would allow the issue to be duplicated by me (or others)?

matthew.k.gumbel@intel.com (JIRA)

unread,
May 6, 2020, 2:39:02 PM5/6/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Matt G commented on Bug JENKINS-61515

Darn... No, sorry, no additional info. We do try to use webhooks where possible, but in some cases are still relying on polling. No problem to close this issue as non-reproducible.

mark.earl.waite@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
May 6, 2020, 4:08:02 PM5/6/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Mark Waite closed an issue as Cannot Reproduce
 
Change By: Mark Waite
Status: Open Closed
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages