Changelog li's

Suckow, Thomas J

unread,

May 26, 2015, 11:58:08 AM5/26/15

to jenkin...@googlegroups.com

The changelog li's should really have </li>, instead the browser has to "figure it out"

Just a thought...

-

Thomas

Daniel Beck

unread,

May 26, 2015, 1:38:43 PM5/26/15

to jenkin...@googlegroups.com

On 26.05.2015, at 17:58, Suckow, Thomas J <Thomas...@pnnl.gov> wrote:

> The changelog li's should really have </li>, instead the browser has to "figure it out"

This appears to be valid HTML, so any browser that fails to figure this out should probably be avoided.

Quoting http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/intro/sgmltut.html:

> Some HTML element types allow authors to omit end tags (e.g., the P and LI element types).

(I'm not saying the changelog has no problems -- it nests an entire <html> document within another for example -- but this isn't one.)

Suckow, Thomas J

unread,

May 26, 2015, 1:44:43 PM5/26/15

to jenkin...@googlegroups.com

I did not know that.
I am going to pretend today is Monday and shut up now.

-
Thomas

>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>"Jenkins Developers" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
>To view this discussion on the web visit
>https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/EFBBB6BA-6F61-4AEC-A5D7-50
>65C3C2CAE9%40beckweb.net.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward