Wasn't the whole reason to rename the artifactId to keep compatibility
with the existing Play plugin?
As Domi mentioned, ideally, existing users should be able upgrade
seamlessly when you publish your version of the plugin.
So I believe the artifactId should remain the same
("play-autotest-plugin"), and the new plugin should migrate any old
config where appropriate.
On 08/17/2014 01:51 AM, Rafael Ribeiro Rezende wrote:
> Or we could take the chance and fix this one at least... But I don't
> know if it would break any reference.
>
> On Aug 16, 2014 3:56 PM, "Daniel Beck" <
m...@beckweb.net
> <mailto:
m...@beckweb.net>> wrote:
>
> More than 150 plugins do it wrong (i.e. have a name ending in
> -plugin), so that's not something to be concerned about.
>
> On 16.08.2014, at 14:57, Rafael Ribeiro Rezende
> <mailto:
do...@fortysix.ch>" <
do...@fortysix.ch
> <mailto:
do...@fortysix.ch>> wrote:
> > the artefactId is taken from the pom.xml (which should not
> contain "-plugin") - the name of the git repository per convention
> is like <artifactId>-plugin
> > Domi
> >
> > On 16 Aug 2014, at 00:37, Rafael Ribeiro Rezende
> <
rafael...@gmail.com <mailto:
rafael...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for pointing that out.
> >> I just noticed that the artifactId is actually
> play-autotest-plugin instead of the play-plugin I assumed at first
> due to the folder name in the jenkinsci Github.
> >>
> >> Just fixed the artifactId to match the older one.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:54 PM, domi <
do...@fortysix.ch
> <mailto:
do...@fortysix.ch>> wrote:
> >> If the old one is not working anymore, then you should integrate
> your stuff into it and try to migrate the old config to the new one,
> this will keep the plugin with the same pluginid and
> >> It will keep the users from scratching there head when searching
> for "the right Play-Plugin"
> >>
> >> Am 15.08.2014 um 14:59 schrieb Rafael Ribeiro Rezende
> <
rafael...@gmail.com <mailto:
rafael...@gmail.com>>:
> >>
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I finally managed some time to finish and test the new Play plugin.
> >>> The Play!Framework plugin is designed to work with every
> existing version of Play, from the first non-sbt-based Play!1.x to
> the latest versions of Activator.
> >>>
> >>> Some important details before publishing:
> >>> There is an existing play-plugin in the public repository that
> served the purposed in the past but isn't supported since 2011.
> Play! has changed quite a lot since then, so that this play-plugin
> is no longer functional.
> >>>
> >>> I've contacted the previous contributor, Takafumi Ikeda, and he
> was very open to the idea of replacing his plugin.
> >>> Therefore, I forked the original plugin o Github, but ended up
> re-developing it from scratch.
> >>> This is the current candidate plugin in my Github.
> >>>
> >>> What should I do next?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send an email to
jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
jenkinsci-dev%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
> <mailto:
jenkinsci-dev%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
> >> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Rafael R Rezende
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send an email to
jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
jenkinsci-dev%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
> <mailto:
jenkinsci-dev%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
> <mailto:
jenkinsci-dev%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
> <mailto:
jenkinsci-dev%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
> <mailto:
jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com>.