On 14.04.2016, at 00:32, James Daniel <
opti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, that is what I was referring to. Is this still a development effort?
We're not changing the storage model for existing job types in 2.0. Doesn't mean it won't go into a later 2.x release though. I CCed Andrew, who should know the current status of the database build storage proposal.