This program seemed to want to do 2 things:
Priscilla and I in her home
Hmm. I can see why Ghana is spreading this message, not only is it dispelling many misconceptions about life in America, but keeping skilled, educated people in Ghana is good for development! Yet, I also see competing messages when I look at Canada’s immigration site where it reports welcoming record numbers of immigrants to satisfy its demand for skilled labour. (http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/releases/2008/2008-03-14.asp)
I asked Pricilla her opinion of this program and she said that it is common for people to believe that just by living in Canada or the US you will have so much more. She said that is silly, and that she is happy to be Ghanaian and living in Ghana. Pricilla has finished university, and is looking to find a job now – she is talented and a hard worker, and from what she tells me of her mother, she comes from a stock of strong women. I have no doubt that Pricilla is happy living in Ghana, and will work to create the life that she wants. She’s not afraid to dream, and she’s got the determination to see them come true. I wonder what percentage of her classmates from primary school she represents.
Our discussion made me think of many that I have had in Canada with my friends and colleagues about the “brain drain” that flows to urban centres and western countries. It is a pattern that evolves among educated young adults who are looking for more opportunities for a better life – and deservedly so – that leaves the communities with a lack of professionals with higher educations. Nick Jimenez, who is from the same EWB sending group as myself, just spent a week in a rural village. There, he had his whole stay interpreted through the only person who could speak fluent English. Nick shared stories of several evenings spent talking with Joshua (his interpreter) where the conversation would turn to Joshua asking him how he could help him get to Canada. Nick struggled to explain that getting to Canada is very difficult, and just getting there doesn’t solve his problems of poverty.
In many ways, comfort and affluence still seem to be abirthright; in that it is easier for some to secure that hard earnedreward than others. Because I was born in Canada, the system was setup to help me. New Canadians still have a difficult time gettingprofessionally certified and trained to enter the workforce. From myfriends in school it seems that in many ways, it is only through children growing up in Canada that they begin to fully take advantage of the benefits of awestern society. But who am I to question people where they live? And why should people settle somewhere, and not move? A study ofinternational migration at Georgetown University(http://www.migrationinformation.org/Profiles/display.cfm?ID=381) statesthat migratory living was the way of many African tribes beforecolonization. So this idea of settling in one area and making thingswork there as opposed to moving somewhere for more opportunities is a bit of a construct in itself. Is migration a natural evolution of society?Is regarding the “brain drain” as negative only because we’re using a short term perspective rather than a long-term one?