Tenzin
I had a question on the specific wording. On your earlier recordings,
I believe 3 or 4, there was discussion of Accepted for Value, Returned
for Value for settlement and closure Exemption ID and your mark (no-
nature) in blue with date. Did this wording have a differnt effect
than the Red. method mentioned above?
I guess I am trying to figure out how this public charge is handled.
Let's say I get a BILL for back taxes. I am going to take the door of
acceptance. Great, so I want to use my soul molecule and operate the
private trust and give this BILL some substance (or take away it's
charge) by writing an A4V on the BILL and send along a money order and
a 1040V. So I am a little fuzzy on how it actually happens. Since we
are telling them to deposit to the US department of treasury and
charge the same to the PUBLIC being, does an account (trust?) get set
up, funded and collapsed? How does the 1040V fit in the conversion
taking place? I would like to put together a flow chart showing the
private and public trusts and how the charge flows thru this process
and back to the chargers.
Thank you
Mark
On Aug 18, 8:03 pm, tenzin gyurme <
gyurme.ten...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Redemption @ Method document on the Google Group,
>
> Jedi Solution A4V Page
>
> Talkshoe call 15.
>
> Peace
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Dan2Nice <
dan2n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please point me towards the "Patch".
>
> > Thank you
>
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:39 PM, tenzin gyurme <
gyurme.ten...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> Create you Own Bill, using their Address and info,
> >> Lump sum it
> >> Then use the Redemption as Method process with the Patch.
>
> >> If someone else acquires the default, per a tax lien sale, challenge the
> >> transfer before it becomes contract via both a public and private process.
>
> >> In the Public, also do an 'Offer in Compromise' to stall the public until
> >> the Red@Method process kicks in, which may take a while.
>
> >> Be prepared to do more docs in the public as the challenge rises, but only
> >> pro per, as the slave, vis-a-vie your new contract by the 'Offer in
> >> Compromise', not as a Sovereign How To.
>
> >> Those can get complicated, and the Public already has title and Control
> >> of your property, you just have possession, and that can change in a
> >> heartbeat.
>
> >> Tenzin
>
> >>> > Founderwww.rlifecoach.comwww.thezenden.uswww.soultv.me-Hide quoted