Long living SyncProxy

瀏覽次數:17 次
跳到第一則未讀訊息

Bartosz Wilk

未讀,
2013年4月29日 凌晨4:32:432013/4/29
收件者:jcl...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

we use long-living ComputeServiceContext (which as I assume is not bad - https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/jclouds/3aMDPxY5L8w/DfGavkxYZ6oJ). After about 30 days of operation the LoadingCache<ClassMethodArgs, Object> delegateMap which is a field in org.jclouds.concurrent.internal.SyncProxy grows very big (about 400Megs which is unacceptable for us). Is there any method to limit the size of this cache? How to do it?

Thank in advance,
Bartosz Wilk

we use jclouds 1.5.7


Adrian Cole

未讀,
2013年4月29日 上午9:44:382013/4/29
收件者:jcl...@googlegroups.com
Id switch to 1.6.0 as sync proxy had bad behavior and has been written out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jclouds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jclouds+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to jcl...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Andrew Phillips

未讀,
2013年4月29日 上午10:50:012013/4/29
收件者:jcl...@googlegroups.com
Hi Bartosz

> we use jclouds 1.5.7

This isn't an immediate solution to your problem, but as a result of
#1501 [1] you'll find that SyncProxy is disappearing ;-) Is there any
way you can try out the latest 1.6.0 release [2] to see if that makes
any difference?

ap

[1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1501
[2] http://blog.jclouds.org/post/49146565342/jclouds-1-6-0-released

Adrian Cole

未讀,
2013年4月29日 上午10:52:272013/4/29
收件者:jcl...@googlegroups.com
Ps I first read this subject as "long live sync proxy" a horrific thought :p

Bartosz Wilk

未讀,
2013年4月29日 中午12:31:162013/4/29
收件者:jcl...@googlegroups.com、aphi...@qrmedia.com
Adrian, Andrew,
thanks for replies. I'll try 1.6.0 and come back with effects. It may take some time to reproduce the problem so please be patient :)...

Bartosz
回覆所有人
回覆作者
轉寄
0 則新訊息