| terminate=wait (I) | switch to elder log sets as required and wait for new updates |
| timeout=nnn (I) | timeout period in seconds for ‘terminate=wait' |
Piotr--
--
IMPORTANT: T24/Globus posts are no longer accepted on this forum.
To post, send email to jB...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to jBASE-un...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jBASE" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jbase+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
We are
using a very old version of jbase ( 4.0.7.3 on Aix 6.1 ). Nevertheless, in my opinion it absolutely
fulfills our needs. It is fast and stable enough for our purposes. In our current situation, the realization of a
project like changing the version of jbase would take at least several months,
making such a decision virtually impossible, at least for the time being. I
have to solve the jlogdup problem without changing the version - it used to work
correctly.
Why would creating logsets again help solve this problem?
Initially I thought that the reason for the problems is the TL of aix, but now I’m affraid that jlogdup was wrong from the beginning, from the first day of useing jlogdup on LIVE environment ( I have checked my mailbox ).
All 4 logsets has been recreated on clear filesystem.
I didn't reinstall jbase - we are affraid of "big explosion" on LIVE after that :) - but who knows, it could be solution ...
Regards
Piotr