Hi all:
After thinking more about the idea of self-teaching and the different
approaches that various materials provide, I wanted to comment a
bit more on the Conti materials. I also have a collection of the Guitar
College materials, and can comment a bit on those.
The Conti materials are really geared toward somebody who has had
soe experience playing guitar already. You are at least somewhat
familiar with the fretboard and have some facility with playing at least
basic chords around the fretboard.
In past threads along these lines, some people have commented that
Conti' "Chord Melody Assembly Line" SourceCode book 5 is "paint by
the numbers", and that this is not a particularly good approach. There
seems to be a general consensus that his SourceCode book 4, "The
Formula", is quite good.
The value in Conti's SourceCode book 5 is in the way it helps a person
get started and moving along with chord melody playing. As he says in
that book, he can't know the playing level of each person who acquires
this book. What the book does is to do the equivalent of a teacher walking
a student through creating a chord melody arrangement from a fakebook.
Conti's approach is to "eliminate all possibility for confusion by having
a single solution for each problem he presents" (quoted from the book).
So, if you are given a particular melody note and told to harmonize it
with a particular type of chord, you will readily have a solution literally
in hand. The book gives you a way to harmonize the C entire major
scale (plus some other notes) using C major, F major, Dmi7, etc, to
cover the whole key of C. Contrast that with simply knowing the
harmonized major scale, where you have the familiar pattern of
major, minor, and diminished chords. It is then up to you to transpose
this to the other keys. He makes the process painless, and the
memorization comes (as with any of his books) through using the
material to play real songs in fakebooks.
Now, that description certainly does describe "paint by the numbers",
and would be limiting if that is all Conti provides. However, he says
quite clearly that this is a first step to get you moving forward. As
you gain facility wth this approach, you will dive into SourceCode
book 4, and get a lot more out of it. In that book, he opens up the
whole world of harmony in a way that it becomes a natural
progression from the preparatory work done in book 5.
Then, you move on to SourceCode book 3 "Intros, Endings, and
Turnarounds", and start adding those ideas to your repetoire.
Along the way, you start to become an altogether decent chord
melody player, and all the while you were playing real tunes from
fakebooks, building repetoire while developing your own vocabulary.
SourceCode books 1 and 2 deal with single lines. One is intended to
build your technique using violin etudes setup specifically for developing
technique on the guitar, and the other teaches you how to generate
interesting single line phrases and apply them in a variety of situations.
Again, in the books Conti explains what you are to do, what the intended
purpose is, and gives you a sesne of how to move along through the book
in terms of what it means to "know" material before moving on to the next
idea.
In each of his videos, Conti will take a chord progression to a tune and
play a solo over it. The rest of the video will then take this solo apart
phrase by phrase, show you how to play it, and then how to use the
individual phrases to build a vocabulary that can be used in a variety
of settings, much as he does in his book on Jazz Lines. I have one or
two of his VHS tapes, but have not yet acquired any of his DVDs, though
I would assume they are along similar lines.
Throughout all of these books and videos, there are two things that Conti
does that (in my opinion) differentiate him from many other materials in
the same market space:
1. He makes sure each step of the way that you understand what you are
to do, how to know when it is time to move on to the next idea (very important
to the self-teacher), and then how to move on applying the ideas you learned.
2. He takes one, very practical (musically useful) concept at a time, and makes
sure you understand it and can use it to make music, instead of dumping a
whole bunch of stuff on you and leaving you to try to figure out what to do with
it and how to really learn it.
A good contrast between Conti's materials and those of Guitar College is that
Conti's materials are entirely experiential, with the real learning being done
by playing through it all. Guitar College's materials are really much like
going to school to learn guitar. There is a healthy combination of theory
and application, printed materials and CDs. The idea is to listen to the
CD and follow along with the book. A single book will have 6 CDs with
it, so there is certainly a lot of guidance.
Guitar College is an excellent choice for the self-learner. The approach
is different from Conti's, and is probably better for somebody starting
from scratch, though experienced players can drop into whatever they
feel like learning. There is a course that consists of audio CDs designed
to teach you music theory in the car while driving to and from work. These
give some written assignments such as writing out all the major scales on
paper using the "template" for the major scale as a guide (after Rich
thoroughly explains the process on the CDs, fo course). He explains
the theory you need to know to build scales and chords, understand
chordal relationships, etc, as well as providing ear trainging to hear
intervals.
There are a lot of book/CD combinations in the form that is directly
analogous to being in a classroom. This is heavy duty stuff for the
serious musician. If you are a working adult who would like to "drop
out" of your life for a year or two or three and go to a music school
such as GIT or Berklee, but can't, this is an ideal approach. This is
a much longer term commitment, in a sense, then is the Conti material.
Obviously, in either case, there is a lifetime of work. The difference is
that Conti's materials are quite focused on specific aspects of playing
jazz guitar, and it is not difficult to stay motivated long enough to get
through them. Guitar College's mateerials are similar to going to a
trade school to learn to play guitar, and therefore cover a lot of bases
from blues to rock to country to jazz, and all starting with a solid basic
musical education.
Rich Severson is a very sincere guy. His low-key approach is relaxing,
yet amazingly thorough. He gets across quite clearly what he wants you
to do and how to go about it. He is responsive if you email him, since
his intention is to maintain a degree of interactiveness throughout your
studies.
There is no comparison between these courses because they are intended
for different audiences, though both are geared to the self-teacher.
The Conti materials are very, very good if you want to become proficient at
playing jazz guitar. They provided a means of getting you off to a solid start
and equipping you to continue a lifetime of self-directed learning. Results
will become visible sooner using the Conti materials, but then, the assumption
is that you already have some degree of proficiency with the guitar. His
materials will take you from a basic level of playing into a solid player,
make no mistake about that. I highly recommend them.
The Guitar College materials are for those who specifically wanted to go
to guitar school and get a broad base education across a variety of guitar
styles. The direction is clear and the combination of written and audio
material will get sure results for the learner who is capable of being
self-motivated on all this material for a long time. You can drop into,
say, his blues or fingerstyle course, and just do that. However, the
real learning comes from making a long term commitment and going
the whole nine yards. If you decide to do that, Rich offers a number
of special priced combinations of courses, with the "Serious Student"
being the comprehensive one.
In the long run, I think the Conti and Guitar College materials can
actually complement each other. You can either start with the Conti
materials and become proficient in jazz, and later decide to fill in
a lot of foundation elsewhere with Guitar College (as I have been
doing), or start with Guitar College and then go the extra mile with
Conti's materials.
I got the Conti materials first, and later started working with the Guitar
College materials. I am happy with the way that worked out. I will
continue to work through the Conti materials regardless of what else
I am doing, because they are so rich with information and a refresher
is always valuable. If I had to pick just one set of materials to purchase,
it would be the Conti materials because they have worked well for me
and fit my interests well. Fortunately, I was able to swing both (several
years apart, of course).
In self-teaching, motivation and maintaining a sense of direction become
the task of the learner, without any help from a real, live teacher. In my
personal experience, it is easier to mainitain motivation throughout
working with the Conti materials than with the Guitar College materials.
The reason is that the Guitar College materials are much more dense,
have many more excercises, and the ratio of playing excercises to
playing songs is much less than that of the Conti materials. This is
not a flaw in the Guitar College materials. If you go to college to learn
to become proficient as a guitarist, you would expect to find the same
mix.
However, you need to be aware of this factor, because either set of
materials will cost you some serious money and you need to be sure
the commitment to get through it is there. With the Conti materials,
you don't study a lot of theory and, outside of the etudes for violin
(which are actually music too), you are really playing jazz in the
form of single line solos and chord melody. It is easier to stay
motivated learning while making music than while slogging through
a lot of excercises and theory. The tradeoff is that, if you want to
study theory intensively and broaden your scope to country, blues,
and such, then you will be looking for material outside the scope of
the Conti materials, should you choose to go that route. But that
is really one of the real strengths of the Conti approach. He is
very focused and clears a path for you to get directly to where he
wants to take you, should you choose to go there.
In closing, I would definitely say that having a cohesive set of materials
to work from is, at least for me, far more effective than the odd book here
and there. The other books I have collected over the years are, in my
opinion, adjuncts to the core study materials provide by Robert Conti,
and later, Rich Severson. Both guys are excellent players and teachers.
That is somewhat unusual. More often, great players don't make great
teachers, and great teachers probably would not be building playing
careers for themselves. Obviously, Howard Robets comes immediately
to mind as an excpetion, and there are several others. But in general,
this seems to be true. Both Robert Conti and Rich Severson are great
players and teachers. I hope this post gave a flavor of what these
courses are about.
Tony B