Following @nodeaz on twitter.
--
Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info/
... FRA #009: Opportunity plus instinct equals profit.
--
--- Group information: http://groups.google.com/group/javascript-az/
JavaScript Ninja Training: http://www.jsninja.org/
=== You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "javascript-az" group.
To post to this group, send email to javasc...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
javascript-a...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javascript-az?hl=en
Rob Robbins wrote:
> I am with Luis on that. Just Node seems too narrow a scope to keep a
> group going IMO. I do actively develop with it though, so of course am
> interested in it being part of the larger js group
>
> On Feb 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Luis Montes wrote:
>
>> A whole group dedicated to just Node.js? Would rather see
>> javavascript-az active again and covering Node.js, ringojs, dojo,
>> jquery, noSQL, etc.
>>
>> Luis
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Michael J. Ryan
>> <mygr...@tracker1.info <mailto:mygr...@tracker1.info>> wrote:
>>
>> Anyone have any information/status on this?
>>
>> Following @nodeaz on twitter.
>>
>> --
>> Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info/
>>
>> ... FRA #009: Opportunity plus instinct equals profit.
>>
>> --
>> --- Group information: http://groups.google.com/group/javascript-az/
>> JavaScript Ninja Training: http://www.jsninja.org/
>> === You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "javascript-az" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> javasc...@googlegroups.com <mailto:javasc...@googlegroups.com>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> javascript-a...@googlegroups.com
>> <mailto:javascript-az%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/javascript-az?hl=en
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> Group information: http://groups.google.com/group/javascript-az/
>> JavaScript Ninja Training: http://www.jsninja.org/
>> ===
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "javascript-az" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to javasc...@googlegroups.com
>> <mailto:javasc...@googlegroups.com>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> javascript-a...@googlegroups.com
>> <mailto:javascript-a...@googlegroups.com>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/javascript-az?hl=en
>
> --
> ---
> Group information: http://groups.google.com/group/javascript-az/
> JavaScript Ninja Training: http://www.jsninja.org/
> ===
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "javascript-az" group.
> To post to this group, send email to javasc...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> javascript-a...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javascript-az?hl=en
--
Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info/
... FRA #194: It's always good business to know about new customers before
they walk in the door.
It's not really OOP, it's more about packaging content into usable modules...
Node is the V8 engine with an implementation of the CommonJS API for purposes
of package use/reuse... It's a bit different than what you tend to get used
to in client-side JS.
I've seen other systems that simply eval() included scripts when called via
require(path-to-js), as opposed to how node only returns what's exported.
The other thing that may seem more or less alien, is the use of callbacks with
almost everything, not generally using direct events... Which is emphatically
not OO, it's very functional in nature.
IMHO it's like C with JS syntax/expression. It seems to work very well for
heavily IO driven code... I think it's the asynchronous nature that throws
people off in terms of thinking of server-side code.. and the CommonJS syntax
gets people used to client-side JS.
--
Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info/
... FRA #035: War is good for business.