The only information I've been able to find is this suggestion:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.argyllcms/8541
about Firefox for Android being able to do its own color management. But
of course this would exclude any other application rendering images. Is it
still like that, am I missing something, is something announced for the
future? Without CMM Android can't be used by professional photographers or
graphic designers (not counting that as a committed photographer I'm
particularly committed in spreading the color management culture even to
casual users and Android seems to kill this intention).
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
fabrizio...@tidalwave.it
http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it
It's very easy to achieve that on multiple devices, just like you achieve
that on regular monitors, that vary a lot. There's software around that
allows to create a specific profile for each monitor, and a CMM module
(Color Management) would property translate an incoming image properly.
It's what I've been doing to my laptop and external monitor for a decade.
What Android seems to lack is the capability of loading a LUT into the
video card (I bet the hardware allows that, it's just missing a o.s. call)
and the CMM module. It's a software thing.
> I get that we have been doing this with tradition RGB panels (CRT, TFT
Even my MacBook Pro display only offers brightness adjustment, but the
graphic card offers three independent LUTs for each channel. This has been
enough for calibration and setting the white point. In any case, if
devices don't allow it, it's really a shame. Since Android also mandates
requirements for the hardware, it would mean that Google is not paying
attention to this feature.
Since Android also mandates
requirements for the hardware, it would mean that Google is not paying
attention to this feature.
Apart from the fact that "niche" in this case means media professionals,
it's also a cultural thing. People will be seeing visual stuff more and
more through mobile devices, and will see more and more with the wrong
colors. Now I don't care for YouTube (which I don't use anyway), but if
you are looking at a movie or a picture exhibit this makes a big
difference. It's also happening with monitors and TV equipments, of
course, since color management is not a common practice, but with Google's
lack of care in this area things will go worse. It's the typical case in
which technology for the masses damages culture and frankly it's quite
delusional that Google doesn't care.
Now I don't care for YouTube (which I don't use anyway), but if
you are looking at a movie or a picture exhibit this makes a big
difference.
It's also happening with monitors and TV equipments, of
course, since color management is not a common practice, but with Google's
lack of care in this area things will go worse. It's the typical case in
which technology for the masses damages culture and frankly it's quite
delusional that Google doesn't care.
As you said, this is a statement that is just as true for televisions
in general. The vast majority of them are not color calibrated that
well. I think the truth is that the majority of folks just don't care
about color calibration. Worse, many get upset if you try and
convince them that they should.
>
> As you said, this is a statement that is just as true for televisions
> in general. The vast majority of them are not color calibrated that
> well. I think the truth is that the majority of folks just don't care
> about color calibration. Worse, many get upset if you try and
> convince them that they should.
The point is that that portion of users that is concerned about color
management can't do anything with his Android tablet. And if you'd like to
campaign pro color management, you're stuck with the fact that more and
more devices don't support it. Keep also in mind that color management was
expensive in the past and is getting less and less expensive now, so in
theory it could become more popular.
Fair points. Anything I can do to help out, I'll be willing. (Vote
on issues will likely be the best help I can give, but I'm game to try
other things. Don't have an Android yet, but if I get one I can
volunteer it to try out stuff.)
Now I don't care for YouTube (which I don't use anyway), but if
you are looking at a movie or a picture exhibit this makes a big
difference.Sure, some of us who care about image quality may buy good panels (i.e. I care greatly about black-levels so I still watch movies on Plasma) and take the time to calibrate. Your average Joe however, will just leave the over-saturated color and contrast which the manufacturers and stores use, in order to draw attention. So you can argue that users should be able to calibrate their smartphone/tablet screens as they see fit, but I still maintain that the majority of users have no clue about this. The same goes for sound btw. where enthusiasts like George Lucas came up with the THX certification, yet most people are contend with their crappy Sony system made from cheap IC's and resistors.
The point is that that portion of users that is concerned about color
management can't do anything with his Android tablet.
And if you'd like to
campaign pro color management, you're stuck with the fact that more and
more devices don't support it.
Keep also in mind that color management was
expensive in the past and is getting less and less expensive now, so in
theory it could become more popular.
> then for HP/Canon/Nikon/Eizo to do something here. Btw. you make it sound
> like your previous cell phones had advanced color management and somehow
> I
> doubt that.
No, I'm making it sound as Apple's stuff has got it. At least from this
respect, they have an advantage. What I'm really puzzled about is that
most hardware supports this and Google just needs to add a simple API call
to populate a LUT. Is this really so hard?
BTW, I've just tried Adobe Reader on my Asus Transformer, with a PDF
photobook I've prepared (so I can visually compare with the original
photos). In spite of being pre-converted to sRGB, they aren't rendered
with the proper colors. So it seems Adobe isn't paying attention to colors
too.