--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to java...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
It's not the fonts per se, it's a Java problem — Java font rendering on
Linux is terrible. No company sees fixing this as in their commercial
interest, so it doesn't get fixed. I guess JetBrains only get an income
stream from Windows and OS X folk, so don't care about Linux.
> 2. If unhappy with the default versions of apps in the repository I
> have to do manual installs - latest version of ant or ruby for example
> were nightmares to upgrade.
No idea about Ruby, but installing the latest Ant on Debian Testing (and
hence Debian anything and Ubuntu anything) is really straightforward and
about a 2 minute task. On the other hand 1.8.2 is the standard on
Debian Testing so no need for a manual install.
--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 08:20 +0100, Rakesh wrote:
[ . . . ]
> 2. If unhappy with the default versions of apps in the repository INo idea about Ruby, but installing the latest Ant on Debian Testing (and
> have to do manual installs - latest version of ant or ruby for example
> were nightmares to upgrade.
hence Debian anything and Ubuntu anything) is really straightforward and
about a 2 minute task. On the other hand 1.8.2 is the standard on
Debian Testing so no need for a manual install.
I guess JetBrains only get an income
stream from Windows and OS X folk, so don't care about Linux.
> Isn't that a bit harsh to JetBrains? It seems to me that pretty much
> every single Java application (and even non-Java apps) have terrible
> font rendering problems on Linux.
>
Yes and no. Yes JetBrains are a good bunch of people and a lot of
people like and buy (or freetard :-) their products.
Every Java application on Linux looks totally crap, because Sun only
ever put real effort into getting the Windows graphics working, leaving
Solaris, Linux and Unix out in the cold.
Applications that work in harmony with GTK or Qt either on Gnome or KDE
have very good looking fonts — assuming the fonts outlines are good, and
the right hinting level for the outlines is used.
>
> It's been this way for decades. That and bad scrolling speed in
> terminal windows (maybe the two are related).
That may be true on Windows, but OS X is sort of OK and Linux seems
fine.
Of course JetBrains do not support IntelliJ IDEA running on OpenJDK only
on Sun JDK.
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.0pre) (7~b147-2.0~pre4-1)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 21.0-b17, mixed mode)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 21.0-b17, mixed mode)
WARNING: You are launching IDE using OpenJDK Java runtime
THIS IS STRICTLY UNSUPPORTED DUE TO KNOWN PERFORMANCE AND GRAPHICS
PROBLEMS
NOTE: If you have both Sun JDK and OpenJDK installed
please validate either IDEA_JDK or JDK_HOME environment variable points
to valid Sun JDK installation
--
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
fabrizio...@tidalwave.it
http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to java...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Like someone (jrp) said, the Nimbus LaF looks pretty neat, even when using the GTK+ theme it looks good if you choose a suited font. The UI font doesn't really matter as much as the editor font, which looks really good IMHO.I don't see why using non-standard versions of applications is a nightmare. At work all the developers run Ubuntu/Kubuntu and it's really not a pain. Something that makes it really easy is the 'update-alternatives' utility. Long story short, you can add multiple versions and just switch to the version you feel like using.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/javaposse/-/-8XLv5nv1mAJ.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+...@googlegroups.com.
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
> so I can change the L&F of Intellij and its nicer but it doesn't really
> affect the fonts.
>
> Eclipse looks acceptable out-of-the-box on Ubuntu. Yes, I know its not a
> Swing client but is Java really that bad at doing decent fonts? In 2011?
Can we have a screenshot when talking of fonts? One never knows whether
there's actually a problem or it's a matter of expectations.
Has anyone tried out the Ubuntu monospace font? I haven't gotten around to it myself (may not be a great programmer's font) but it should render nice on ubuntu.
so I can change the L&F of Intellij and its nicer but it doesn't really affect the fonts.Eclipse looks acceptable out-of-the-box on Ubuntu. Yes, I know its not a Swing client but is Java really that bad at doing decent fonts?