Group: http://groups.google.com/group/jats-to-mediawiki/topics
- Preference for encoding of tables? [5 Updates]
- XSLT 2.0? [2 Updates]
Jeremy Morse <jgm...@umich.edu> May 31 08:38AM -0400
Great, I'll work on tables and embedded images (using Daniel's
file-renaming algorithm) tonight.
On May 30, 2012 11:59 PM, "Daniel Mietchen" <daniel....@googlemail.com>
wrote:
Daniel Mietchen <daniel....@googlemail.com> May 31 03:29PM +0200
Sounds good. I'll be attending a Wikimedia hackathon over the weekend.
Any chance that I could demo the converter there?
Daniel
Jeremy Morse <jgm...@umich.edu> May 31 10:33AM -0400
I don't see why not, except: if I've implemented the Links code to use your
renaming algorithm, and you haven't applied the same algorithm to the
filenames in the sample data, then the images won't display correctly in
your demo.
Now that I think about it: is you want this XSLT to be generally useful for
any JATS to MediaWiki transformation anyone might want to do, you might
want to consider whether this renaming algorithm is generally useful. An
"out of the box" solution might preferably use the filenames as-is.
Thoughts?
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Daniel Mietchen <
Daniel Mietchen <daniel....@googlemail.com> May 31 10:51PM +0200
I currently don't see any other projects in need of JATS-to-MediaWiki
conversion incl. file names, but yes, a generic solution is generally
preferable.
The reasoning behind the proposed naming scheme is mainly
compatibility with naming policies on Wikimedia Commons, where the
files will end up. But this could be achieved by a simple script that
runs after the generic XSLT.
d.
Jeremy Morse <jgm...@umich.edu> May 31 05:04PM -0400
That might be the best approach; it's also an easy problem to solve while
post-processing (or pre-processing) the XML in Perl or Python, a fair but
trickier (but not impossible!) in XSLT.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Daniel Mietchen <
Jeremy Morse <jgm...@umich.edu> May 31 08:39AM -0400
Am I free to use XSLT 2.0 or should I stick to 1.0?
Daniel Mietchen <daniel....@googlemail.com> May 31 03:30PM +0200
Are there any known issues with 2.0 that would stand in the way of our
using it? Otherwise, I don't see a reason why to stick to 1.0.
d.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group jats-to-mediawiki.
--
You can post via email.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
For more options, visit this group.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JATS-to-MediaWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to jats-to-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jats-to-mediaw...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jats-to-mediawiki?hl=en.