Re: Digest for jats-to-mediawiki@googlegroups.com - 7 Messages in 2 Topics

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Lyubomir Penev

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 6:02:31 AM6/1/12
to jats-to-...@googlegroups.com
I wonder, if the convertor could be used to convert our NLM-compliant XMLs (e.g., at www.pensoft.net/journals/zookeys or www.pensoft.net/journals/phytokeys) to a Wiki version of the same article, which we could also publish online alongside with the PDF, HTML and the XML?

Would be a interesting pilot.

Best regards,
Lyubo

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:53 PM, <jats-to-...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/jats-to-mediawiki/topics

    Jeremy Morse <jgm...@umich.edu> May 31 08:38AM -0400  

    Great, I'll work on tables and embedded images (using Daniel's
    file-renaming algorithm) tonight.
    On May 30, 2012 11:59 PM, "Daniel Mietchen" <daniel....@googlemail.com>
    wrote:
     

     

    Daniel Mietchen <daniel....@googlemail.com> May 31 03:29PM +0200  

    Sounds good. I'll be attending a Wikimedia hackathon over the weekend.
    Any chance that I could demo the converter there?
     
    Daniel
     

     

    Jeremy Morse <jgm...@umich.edu> May 31 10:33AM -0400  

    I don't see why not, except: if I've implemented the Links code to use your
    renaming algorithm, and you haven't applied the same algorithm to the
    filenames in the sample data, then the images won't display correctly in
    your demo.
     
    Now that I think about it: is you want this XSLT to be generally useful for
    any JATS to MediaWiki transformation anyone might want to do, you might
    want to consider whether this renaming algorithm is generally useful. An
    "out of the box" solution might preferably use the filenames as-is.
    Thoughts?
     
    On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Daniel Mietchen <

     

    Daniel Mietchen <daniel....@googlemail.com> May 31 10:51PM +0200  

    I currently don't see any other projects in need of JATS-to-MediaWiki
    conversion incl. file names, but yes, a generic solution is generally
    preferable.
     
    The reasoning behind the proposed naming scheme is mainly
    compatibility with naming policies on Wikimedia Commons, where the
    files will end up. But this could be achieved by a simple script that
    runs after the generic XSLT.
     
    d.
     

     

    Jeremy Morse <jgm...@umich.edu> May 31 05:04PM -0400  

    That might be the best approach; it's also an easy problem to solve while
    post-processing (or pre-processing) the XML in Perl or Python, a fair but
    trickier (but not impossible!) in XSLT.
     
    On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Daniel Mietchen <

     

    Jeremy Morse <jgm...@umich.edu> May 31 08:39AM -0400  

    Am I free to use XSLT 2.0 or should I stick to 1.0?

     

    Daniel Mietchen <daniel....@googlemail.com> May 31 03:30PM +0200  

    Are there any known issues with 2.0 that would stand in the way of our
    using it? Otherwise, I don't see a reason why to stick to 1.0.
     
    d.
     

     

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group jats-to-mediawiki.
You can post via email.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
For more options, visit this group.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JATS-to-MediaWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to jats-to-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jats-to-mediaw...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jats-to-mediawiki?hl=en.



--
Prof. Dr. Lyubomir Penev
Managing Director
Pensoft Publishers
13a Geo Milev Street
1111 Sofia, Bulgaria
Fax +359-2-8704282
www.pensoft.net
Services for scientific projects: http://www.pensoft.net/services-for-scientific-projects
Services for journals: http://www.pensoft.net/services-for-journals

Chris Maloney

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 7:57:37 AM6/1/12
to jats-to-...@googlegroups.com
My understanding is that it's definitely a goal of this project to produce something that is generally useful for "JATS" documents.  The PMC OA subset is just the initial test suite.  TaxPub was definitely mentioned as one of the flavors of JATS that should be supported.

But I'm confused.  Don't you already convert all your ZooKeys articles to MediaWiki format for pushing them to the Species-ID wiki?

Daniel Mietchen

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 3:43:09 PM6/1/12
to jats-to-...@googlegroups.com
Hi Chris,

so far, Pensoft journals only export taxonomic treatments to species
ID - no complete articles have been processed that way, but the
JATS-to-MediaWiki converter could certainly be used that way.

Daniel
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages