Hello,
The predictions in JASPAR and UniBind are made very differently.
For JASPAR, we took all PFMs in JASPAR and scanned the genomes with
the same thresholds for all matrices. You can find the details in
the supplementary material of the JASPAR 2018 manuscript
(
https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/46/D1/D260/4621338).
For UniBind, we took a more stringent/robust approach to predict
high-quality direct TF-DNA interactions. The predictions require to
have both computational (JASPAR PFMs) and experimental (ChIP-seq)
evidence for direct TF-DNA binding. The necessity to have both PFMs
and ChIP-seq available for a given TF reduces the amount of TFs for
which we can make robust predictions. And the method finds the
optimal PWM threshold to be used in a dataset-specific manner. You
can find the details in the corresponding manuscript at
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.17.384578.
I hope this addresses your questions.