JASPAR Q&A Forum

Dear Aleksandra, Thanks for your interest in JASPAR. The 274 profiles you are referring to were

Dear Laura, Thanks for your enquiry. In the latest JASPAR release, we discarded unused collections

Dear Hanwen, We currently do not provide this functionality. I guess you should add your motifs

Hi Brendan, Yes, you are correct. I would suggest that you use our set of predefined TFBSs provided

Hi Thang, Thanks for your interest in JASPAR. The TF gene names are provided in the metadata, which

Click on one of the IDs (they point to the links I gave you in another thread) and then you can

As I wrote above, you can download the BED files to look for overlap in your region of interest. We

Hi Danial, We have 3 PFMs from CTCF: https://jaspar.genereg.net/matrix/MA0139.1/, https://jaspar.

Hi Anthony, I apologize for the delayed response. I am attempting to restart the process from the

Hi Jessica, I have to update the documentation on GitHub, but I have implemented what you requested.

Thanks so much for pointing that out. We will fix that asap. Best AM On Wednesday, August 31, 2022 at

Thanks very much for pointing that you. We'll address this as you suggest to make it clearer. On

Hi Effie, Thanks for your request. It seems the OSX xargs does not allow for long options (see https:

Thanks very much for the info. Best AM On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 9:29:31 PM UTC+2 malcol...@gmail

Dear Malcolm, Thanks for your interest in JASPAR. We have moved our local instance to sqlite for

Indeed - thanks for the correction and tip. On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 4:14:06 PM UTC-5 oriol...

Hi Sharon, Of course, that's no problem at all as long as the JASPAR paper is appropriately cited

Thank you very much for raising this issue. I agree with you and we will fix this issue asap. On

Dear Selam, We do not provide that unfortunately. On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 10:50:25 AM UTC+2

Dear Wojciech, You have a good point here. We provide the mapping but in a non-parsable way, which is

Sorry for the delayed reply. I assume it has been fixed now. On Tuesday, July 27, 2021 at 6:30:20 PM

Unfortunately, these BED files were created too long ago and the assembly version was not recorded

Hi Tania, The score corresponds to the PWM score, which is the sum of positive and negative scores in

Sorry for the delay in addressing this Farzin. This has now been fixed. Thanks for raising the issue.

I suggest that you look at the JASPAR and UniBind TFBS predictions and intersect them with your

Afraid not. If you need help for using this extension you can contact me at 12509...@qq.com. I can

Thank you so much Jaime! :) El dia dijous, 16 de desembre de 2021 a les 11:33:52 UTC+1, loka...@gmail

Dear Xiuru, You could use our new pyJASPAR package to get this (https://pypi.org/project/pyjaspar/).

You could also use the JASPAR Biopython package or the very fast PWMscan tool (https://academic.oup.

Hi Nathan Thanks for let us know about this issue. We are currently working on it (and in other bugs/