Gem

[Michael Gaffney]

I was wondering what the final delivery form of Jasmine was going to be?

*A gem
*An install
*a subdirectory / submodule

Looking at what we have now I think it would be possible to use jasmine
as a gem in say a rails app as well as as just a gem on the system for
palm apps.

The only thing needed would be some form of config file pointing out all
of the paths.

-Mike

[Davis Frank]

We are planning to break out the code for "Jasmine for Ruby/Rails projects" into a gem.

"Standalone" Jasmine will remain as it is now - a Git repo - so that other environments can adapt as necessary.

As for layout, etc., we're open to input.

--dwf

[Michael Gaffney]

Given that, and deciding on a standard layout (separate thread), it
wouldn't be that hard to make jasmine-webos, and jasmine-rails gems
which would hold the jasmine stuff and the configs and provide rake tasks.

-Mike

[Davis Frank]

WebOS is a little different, as there needed to be a *lot* more than just Jasmine to get testing working.  That's encapsulated differently in a set of code called Pockets that contains a build of Jasmine.

As for Rails (or other Ruby projects), we have a couple of projects at Pivotal where we're trying things out.  We welcome feedback, but the jasmine-ruby gem should be canonical.

--dwf

[Michael Gaffney]

True on pockets, however, it's not out atm, nor is it working anything
except mac AFAIK. Yet I need to do unit tests in all of my webos apps
and I'm not looking forward to managing all of those copies of pockets :).

-Mike

Davis Frank wrote:
> WebOS is a little different, as there needed to be a *lot* more than
> just Jasmine to get testing working. That's encapsulated differently in
> a set of code called Pockets that contains a build of Jasmine.
>
> As for Rails (or other Ruby projects), we have a couple of projects at
> Pivotal where we're trying things out. We welcome feedback, but the
> jasmine-ruby gem should be canonical.
>
> --dwf
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Michael Gaffney <mr.g...@gmail.com
> <mailto:mr.g...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Given that, and deciding on a standard layout (separate thread), it
> wouldn't be that hard to make jasmine-webos, and jasmine-rails gems
> which would hold the jasmine stuff and the configs and provide rake
> tasks.
>
> -Mike
>
> Davis Frank wrote:
> > We are planning to break out the code for "Jasmine for Ruby/Rails
> > projects" into a gem.
> >
> > "Standalone" Jasmine will remain as it is now - a Git repo - so that
> > other environments can adapt as necessary.
> >
> > As for layout, etc., we're open to input.
> >
> > --dwf
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Michael Gaffney
> <mr.g...@gmail.com <mailto:mr.g...@gmail.com>