Functional branch

69 views
Skip to first unread message

Rainer Gemulla

unread,
Sep 17, 2009, 8:30:38 PM9/17/09
to jaql-...@googlegroups.com
Any thoughts on whether or not to merge the functional branch back into
the trunk? Pro is that we get the improvements in functions, get rid of
$, and get modules. Con is that we still did not organize Jaql's builtin
functions into modules; this would be a good opportunity to do so.

Rainer

Vuk Erecegovac

unread,
Sep 17, 2009, 9:48:04 PM9/17/09
to jaql-...@googlegroups.com
This change is backwards compatible with current queries so it seems beneficial to merge back in at this point. It would be nice to figure out a way to maintain backwards compatibility for the proposed builtin modules but we may not get there-- lets make a separate branch for this purpose.
 
Thanks!
 
Vuk

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages