Attention all brand spanking new knights of moral
Disaster
offended at the fact that I threw an address into the group.
Shut up.
It's a public registration and I'm feeling cruel. No one's privacy has
been compromised, nothing bad has actually happened. If you don't like it
you don't have to read it. I'm not pushing it on anyone. So those of you
who are playing, you got no basis to be outraged for those of you who are
really offended, grow the fuck up.
Most of you should know by now that I don't give a crap if you don't like
what I'm doing. So stop wasting your time trying to shame me. It's a
pathetic waste of your time.
--
Carpe Jugulum
Disaster
Disaster's Fan Fiction - http://www.disfanfic.net
DSE - For the Public - http://www.disfanfic.net/DSE
JAE FAQ - http://www.evafaq.com
Pen^3's JAE FAQ - http://faq.pen3.cjb.net
Convention Reports - http://www.disfanfic.net/conventions
Olivier Hagué
<disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
>To all of you who thought that it might be fun to play at being nice or
>offended at the fact that I threw an address into the group.
>
>Shut up.
There's a thing called "netiquette". Look into it.
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > To all of you who thought that it might be fun to play at being nice
or
> > offended at the fact that I threw an address into the group.
> >
> > Shut up.
>
> There's a thing called "netiquette". Look into it.
Don't quote that in my face! This is not a Netiquette issue! Perhaps you
should look into it before you jump the gun!
Olivier Hagué
<disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
>"Olivier Hagué" <o_h...@noos.fr.pasdespameuuuuh.invalid> wrote:
>> There's a thing called "netiquette". Look into it.
>
>Don't quote that in my face! This is not a Netiquette issue!
Did that person want to have his/her postal address disclosed on this
newsgroup?
I assume you don't know. So you shouldn't have done it.
"It's public information and it was in plain sight for all the world
to see"?
Well, if that's the case, why did feel the need to post it, as if it
was the result of some investigation you made?
You're right, it's not even about the netiquette. It's about common
sense and civility.
Get some.
>Carpe Jugulum
>Disaster
>Disaster's Fan Fiction - http://www.disfanfic.net
>DSE - For the Public - http://www.disfanfic.net/DSE
>JAE FAQ - http://www.evafaq.com
>Pen^3's JAE FAQ - http://faq.pen3.cjb.net
>Convention Reports - http://www.disfanfic.net/conventions
Nice sig. And the "Rei clones" one was great too.
Are you sure you know about that "netiquette" thing?
Olivier Hagué
<disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
>"Olivier Hagué" <o_h...@noos.fr.pasdespameuuuuh.invalid> wrote:
>
>Don't quote that in my face! This is not a Netiquette issue!
Did that person want to have his/her postal address disclosed on this
newsgroup?
I assume you don't know. So you shouldn't have done it.
"It's public information and it was in plain sight for all the world
to see"?
Well, if that's the case, why did you feel the need to post it, as if
it was the result of some investigation you made?
You're right, it's not even about the netiquette. It's about common
sense and civility.
Get some.
>Carpe Jugulum
>Disaster
>Disaster's Fan Fiction - http://www.disfanfic.net
>DSE - For the Public - http://www.disfanfic.net/DSE
>JAE FAQ - http://www.evafaq.com
>Pen^3's JAE FAQ - http://faq.pen3.cjb.net
>Convention Reports - http://www.disfanfic.net/conventions
Nice sig. And the "Rei clones" one was great too.
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > "Olivier Hagué" <o_h...@noos.fr.pasdespameuuuuh.invalid> wrote:
> > > There's a thing called "netiquette". Look into it.
> >
> > Don't quote that in my face! This is not a Netiquette issue!
>
> Did that person want to have his/her postal address disclosed on this
> newsgroup?
> I assume you don't know. So you shouldn't have done it.
Obviously not. I don't wait for someone's permission before I look them up
in the phone book and give there number to my father so he can phone them
either though.
> "It's public information and it was in plain sight for all the world
> to see"?
> Well, if that's the case, why did feel the need to post it, as if it
> was the result of some investigation you made?
It was the result of an investigation I did. I did an investigation then I
wanted to see if people could guess who's address it was.
> You're right, it's not even about the netiquette. It's about common
> sense and civility.
> Get some.
Oh my haven't you opened your mouth lately. This the best thread you could
think of to send more then three words too?
> >Carpe Jugulum
> >Disaster
> >Disaster's Fan Fiction - http://www.disfanfic.net
> >DSE - For the Public - http://www.disfanfic.net/DSE
> >JAE FAQ - http://www.evafaq.com
> >Pen^3's JAE FAQ - http://faq.pen3.cjb.net
> >Convention Reports - http://www.disfanfic.net/conventions
>
> Nice sig. And the "Rei clones" one was great too.
> Are you sure you know about that "netiquette" thing?
Are you suggesting that this doesn't comply with the rules? It's a little
big yes, but not overly so. It's not ASCII art, there's no pop-ups any
where and it's all relative to the group.
--
Olivier Hagué
<disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
>I don't wait for someone's permission before I look them up
>in the phone book and give there number to my father so he can phone them
>either though.
Your father.
Anybody with an internet connection.
See the difference?
>> Nice sig. And the "Rei clones" one was great too.
>> Are you sure you know about that "netiquette" thing?
>
>Are you suggesting that this doesn't comply with the rules? It's a little
>big yes, but not overly so. It's not ASCII art, there's no pop-ups any
>where and it's all relative to the group.
It's still too long.
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > I don't wait for someone's permission before I look them up
> > in the phone book and give there number to my father so he can phone
them
> > either though.
>
> Your father.
> Anybody with an internet connection.
>
> See the difference?
My father is a person with an internet connection so there's no difference
no!
> > > Nice sig. And the "Rei clones" one was great too.
> > > Are you sure you know about that "netiquette" thing?
> >
> > Are you suggesting that this doesn't comply with the rules? It's a
little
> > big yes, but not overly so. It's not ASCII art, there's no pop-ups any
> > where and it's all relative to the group.
>
> It's still too long.
No it isn't! It's just big.
Olivier Hagué
OnsenMark
<disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
>To all of you who thought that it might be fun to play at being nice or
>offended at the fact that I threw an address into the group.
>
>Shut up.
>
>It's a public registration and I'm feeling cruel. No one's privacy has
>been compromised, nothing bad has actually happened. If you don't like it
>you don't have to read it. I'm not pushing it on anyone. So those of you
>who are playing, you got no basis to be outraged for those of you who are
>really offended, grow the fuck up.
>
>Most of you should know by now that I don't give a crap if you don't like
>what I'm doing. So stop wasting your time trying to shame me. It's a
>pathetic waste of your time.
I'll agree with Olivier on this. What gives you the right to publish *anyone's*
address here? Because you wanted to see if anyone *recognizes* it? That's a
rather lame excuse.
I think the only thing you've managed to do is lower yourself in a lot of
posters' eyes. Not that you'd probably care. -_-
Mark. 8)
- proud member of the WGPS and the SDA!
-UtenaCode(1.1) U:6 F:Wa+++Ju++ D:Ak->Sh- X:*** a:39++ M:f ZUM(w/Banyuu
Inryoku)
"BE HAPPY FOR ME AND MY SHOE. O_O" - Verthandi
http://www.evafaq.com
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Whatever.
Yeah, sure.
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
> > Most of you should know by now that I don't give a crap if you don't
like
> > what I'm doing. So stop wasting your time trying to shame me. It's a
> > pathetic waste of your time.
>
> I'll agree with Olivier on this. What gives you the right to publish
*anyone's*
> address here? Because you wanted to see if anyone *recognizes* it?
That's a
> rather lame excuse.
I'm not offering excuses and I'm not looking for public approval. Get it
into your head that if you don't fucking like it then you can fuck off as
well.
> I think the only thing you've managed to do is lower yourself in a lot
of
> posters' eyes. Not that you'd probably care. -_-
Then why are you bothering to babble this shit into my face!?
bler
news:umdevj...@corp.supernews.com...
> It's a public registration and I'm feeling cruel. No one's privacy has
> been compromised, nothing bad has actually happened. If you don't like it
> you don't have to read it. I'm not pushing it on anyone. So those of you
> who are playing, you got no basis to be outraged for those of you who are
> really offended, grow the fuck up.
hmm.. haven't been here in a while, figured I might check what's going on..
back in a few months maybe, rather disappointed with the newsgroup postings
I've seen ;(
Disaster
> What gives you the right to publish *anyone's*
> address here?
I believe that it's within the law to publicly publish public information
on a public forum.
Get over it!
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > It's a public registration and I'm feeling cruel. No one's privacy has
> > been compromised, nothing bad has actually happened. If you don't like
it
> > you don't have to read it. I'm not pushing it on anyone. So those of
you
> > who are playing, you got no basis to be outraged for those of you who
are
> > really offended, grow the fuck up.
>
> hmm.. haven't been here in a while, figured I might check what's going
on..
>
> back in a few months maybe, rather disappointed with the newsgroup
postings
> I've seen ;(
If this is below your expectations perhaps you would be better off
spending your energies in posting something worthy of your high standards
as opposed to throwing useless comments in about others.
Olivier Hagué
<disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
>I'm not offering excuses and I'm not looking for public approval.
In other words, you're acting like an ass.
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > I'm not offering excuses and I'm not looking for public approval.
>
> In other words, you're acting like an ass.
...... That wasn't obvious?
OnsenMark
<disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
>"OnsenMark" <locu...@aol.combatrock> wrote:
>> What gives you the right to publish *anyone's*
>> address here?
>
>I believe that it's within the law to publicly publish public information
>on a public forum.
>
>Get over it!
Well, obviously you don't have any *common decency*, now do you? Or a
conscience -- ever hear of one of those?
It would serve you right if everyone killfiled you... maybe it will teach you
get the maturity you so seriously need. -_-
OnsenMark
o_h...@noos.fr.pasdespameuuuuh.invalid (Olivier Hagué) writes:
No. He's gone beyond being an ass.
Heh. Disaster just proved Morgan right. Nice going. >D
Watchman
Now you're getting the hang of it! ;)
--
'Anyone who isn't confused doesn't really know what's going on'
Disaster
> "Olivier Hagué" wrote:
> > "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Whatever.
>
> Now you're getting the hang of it! ;)
LMAO
Shut up Watchman!
Disaster
> Heh. Disaster just proved Morgan right. Nice going. >D
I proved that Morgon thinks that I think that I'm always right? Sorry I
didn't think that needed proof!
Disaster
> conscience -- ever hear of one of those?
No, can you help me? Please wise master, teach me to love!
> It would serve you right if everyone killfiled you... maybe it will
teach you
> get the maturity you so seriously need. -_-
Oh yes, lets see, 2 of you have voiced your distaste for this. That's
about 1% of the group postings I think. So lets kill me, about 50% of the
group posts. What am I talking about, that's not the point is it.
Hey Mark, grow up, get over it. He put that info on the web for the world
to see, why don't you realize that there has been no invasion of privacy,
no misconduct, nothing has happened. To go further, spammers don't scan
the web for mailing addresses, that would cost them money to send to.
It's all public. If someone wanted his info for malicious action all they
would have to do is exactly what I did!
Kakarotto
actually pretty funny go to the "Strongbads email" section, and no
unfortunately it isn't mine.
Kakarotto
Rudolf Polzer
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> >I'm not offering excuses and I'm not looking for public approval.
>
> In other words, you're acting like an ass.
Why does man tend to state the obvious?
"Vs gurl qba'g xrrc ba rkrepvfvat gurve yvcf, ur gubhtug, gurve oenvaf
fgneg jbexvat."
--
[mpg123d] Just playing: .../vintage/a/10 Manatsu no Valentine.mp3
Der dümmste Spammer: siehe <aenl59$g9s$1...@innferno.news.tiscali.de>
Disaster
..... O_o
Someone put far to omuch effort into that. :P
Disaster
Why don't you stop repeating yourself?
Kakarotto
> "Kakarotto" <kaka...@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
> > Why dont we all just shut up and go to this site www.homestarrunner.com,
> its
> > actually pretty funny go to the "Strongbads email" section, and no
> > unfortunately it isn't mine.
>
> Why don't you stop repeating yourself?
> --
I, I, I can't help myself, myself.
Disaster
> Scripsit iste Olivier Hagué <o_h...@noos.fr.pasdespameuuuuh.invalid>:
> > "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > > I'm not offering excuses and I'm not looking for public approval.
> >
> > In other words, you're acting like an ass.
>
> Why does man tend to state the obvious?
>
> "Vs gurl qba'g xrrc ba rkrepvfvat gurve yvcf, ur gubhtug, gurve oenvaf
> fgneg jbexvat."
LMAO
Richard Liang
>
>
>
>I, I, I can't help myself, myself.
>
>
>
>
That almost sounds like an N'Sync song :)
Richard
Kakarotto
"Richard Liang" <rhl...@interchange.ubc.ca> wrote in message
news:3D69F7EE...@interchange.ubc.ca...
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! I HATE THEM, They will feel my wrath and
BURN IN HELL!!!!!!!
--
Kakarotto
"DIE N'Sync DIE!!!!!"
"I SAID DIE!"
Disaster
> BURN IN HELL!!!!!!!
> --
> Kakarotto
>
> "DIE N'Sync DIE!!!!!"
> "I SAID DIE!"
Is that their other song?
OnsenMark
<disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
>"OnsenMark" <locu...@aol.combatrock> wrote:
>> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
>>
>> Well, obviously you don't have any *common decency*, now do you? Or a
>> conscience -- ever hear of one of those?
>
>No, can you help me? Please wise master, teach me to love!
>
>> It would serve you right if everyone killfiled you... maybe it will
>teach you
>> get the maturity you so seriously need. -_-
>
>Oh yes, lets see, 2 of you have voiced your distaste for this. That's
>about 1% of the group postings I think. So lets kill me, about 50% of the
>group posts. What am I talking about, that's not the point is it.
>
>Hey Mark, grow up, get over it. He put that info on the web for the world
>to see, why don't you realize that there has been no invasion of privacy,
>no misconduct, nothing has happened. To go further, spammers don't scan
>the web for mailing addresses, that would cost them money to send to.
>
>It's all public. If someone wanted his info for malicious action all they
>would have to do is exactly what I did!
You. Don't. GET IT. Stop rationalizing for a second, and just listen... er,
read.
So Morgan put his mailing address online for whatever reason. Does that give
you ANY right, at all, to post it whereever you please, without any form of
permission to do so? So Morgan's placing his mailing address on his website
doesn't constitute a privacy violation. That STILL doesn't give you the right
to do what you want with it.
Let me put it this way... put yourself in Morgan's shoes for a second. How
would YOU feel if someone posted your mailing address to a newsgroup? If it
were me, I'd be getting the guy kicked off his ISP for abuse violations(I don't
know if what you did constitutes any sort of abuse violation -- some ISPs might
frowm on this sort of thing), but that's just me.
And those two people... are you even including anyone who might have complained
in the other thread? Think about that one.
Now, if you continue to rationalize that you are completely in the right in
this instance, then there is no point in talking to you about this any further.
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
> You. Don't. GET IT. Stop rationalizing for a second, and just listen...
er,
> read.
No Mark you are not thinking.
> So Morgan put his mailing address online for whatever reason. Does that
give
> you ANY right, at all, to post it whereever you please, without any form
of
> permission to do so? So Morgan's placing his mailing address on his
website
> doesn't constitute a privacy violation. That STILL doesn't give you the
right
> to do what you want with it.
Bottom line is I have not done anything wrong. I have not done anything
that I don't have the right to do. When you put your information on a
public forum you are giving the public the right to do with it what they
wish to. You are effectively handing it out to everyone.
> Let me put it this way... put yourself in Morgan's shoes for a second.
How
> would YOU feel if someone posted your mailing address to a newsgroup?
If they got it from the same source or some other public forum I'd be
fine. It's my own fault for putting it there and if I did put it there I
know what the consequences are. You and anyone else are free to look it up
and post it. Hell I'll do it for you if you like, but I do keep the
information up to date as I've done a bit of moving lately.
> If it were me, I'd be getting the guy kicked off his ISP for abuse
violations(I don't
> know if what you did constitutes any sort of abuse violation -- some
ISPs might
> frowm on this sort of thing), but that's just me.
If I were the ISP I'd be telling you it's your own damn fault for
releasing the info in the first place.
> And those two people... are you even including anyone who might have
complained
> in the other thread? Think about that one.
No, that would up the numbers a little. Say 4? I don't know have you
counted?
> Now, if you continue to rationalize that you are completely in the right
in
> this instance, then there is no point in talking to you about this any
further.
Mark, there was no point from the beginning.
OnsenMark
<disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
>"OnsenMark" <locu...@aol.combatrock> wrote:
>> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
>> You. Don't. GET IT. Stop rationalizing for a second, and just listen...
>er,
>> read.
>
>No Mark you are not thinking.
>
I *AM* thinking. And you're STILL rationalizing.
>> So Morgan put his mailing address online for whatever reason. Does that
>give
>> you ANY right, at all, to post it whereever you please, without any form
>of
>> permission to do so? So Morgan's placing his mailing address on his
>website
>> doesn't constitute a privacy violation. That STILL doesn't give you the
>right
>> to do what you want with it.
>
>Bottom line is I have not done anything wrong. I have not done anything
>that I don't have the right to do. When you put your information on a
>public forum you are giving the public the right to do with it what they
>wish to. You are effectively handing it out to everyone.
>
Where does it SAY you can? Tell me this, please. And if this is the case, then
why don't you put your mailing address out there for the world to see?
>> Let me put it this way... put yourself in Morgan's shoes for a second.
>How
>> would YOU feel if someone posted your mailing address to a newsgroup?
>
>If they got it from the same source or some other public forum I'd be
>fine. It's my own fault for putting it there and if I did put it there I
>know what the consequences are. You and anyone else are free to look it up
>and post it. Hell I'll do it for you if you like, but I do keep the
>information up to date as I've done a bit of moving lately.
>
Disregard the previous comment. Still, that's no excuse to do what you did, no
matter the reason. But evidently you're amoral, so, oh fucking well.
>> If it were me, I'd be getting the guy kicked off his ISP for abuse
>violations(I don't
>> know if what you did constitutes any sort of abuse violation -- some
>ISPs might
>> frowm on this sort of thing), but that's just me.
>
>If I were the ISP I'd be telling you it's your own damn fault for
>releasing the info in the first place.
>
>> And those two people... are you even including anyone who might have
>complained
>> in the other thread? Think about that one.
>
>No, that would up the numbers a little. Say 4? I don't know have you
>counted?
>
Of course, everyone that has commented in my post on LiveJournal about this so
far agrees with me, basically stating that it was absolutely the wrong thing to
do, no matter what. Maybe I should also point them to the relevant threads on
Google, and let them judge for themselves further. But suffice it to say that
they don't like you.
>> Now, if you continue to rationalize that you are completely in the right
>in
>> this instance, then there is no point in talking to you about this any
>further.
>
>Mark, there was no point from the beginning.
And obviously, you're an *amoral* somebody. -_-
Kakarotto
Disaster
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
> > No Mark you are not thinking.
>
> I *AM* thinking. And you're STILL rationalizing.
No you are reacting and of course I am being rational. Tell me where it
says that rational thinking is bad.
> > Bottom line is I have not done anything wrong. I have not done
anything
> > that I don't have the right to do. When you put your information on a
> > public forum you are giving the public the right to do with it what
they
> > wish to. You are effectively handing it out to everyone.
>
> Where does it SAY you can? Tell me this, please. And if this is the
case, then
> why don't you put your mailing address out there for the world to see?
Tell me where it says I can't do it! That's the world for you, the law
tells you what you can't do not what you can do. If I waited for
permission to do anything I'd sit here and starve to death.
> > If they got it from the same source or some other public forum I'd be
> > fine. It's my own fault for putting it there and if I did put it there
I
> > know what the consequences are. You and anyone else are free to look
it up
> > and post it. Hell I'll do it for you if you like, but I do keep the
> > information up to date as I've done a bit of moving lately.
>
> Disregard the previous comment. Still, that's no excuse to do what you
did, no
> matter the reason. But evidently you're amoral, so, oh fucking well.
Oh no no no Mark! I'm not going to disregard it just because suddenly you
feel like you are loosing your grounds for arguing. No you lost that one
as you should realize that you are loosing it everywhere else.
> > If I were the ISP I'd be telling you it's your own damn fault for
> > releasing the info in the first place.
No comment here? Why not? Maybe you got nothing to work with eh?
> > No, that would up the numbers a little. Say 4? I don't know have you
> > counted?
>
> Of course, everyone that has commented in my post on LiveJournal about
this so
> far agrees with me, basically stating that it was absolutely the wrong
thing to
> do, no matter what. Maybe I should also point them to the relevant
threads on
> Google, and let them judge for themselves further. But suffice it to say
that
> they don't like you.
LiveJournal? You talking to a bunch of other people about what I have
done? So you are farming judgments on me behind my back are you? First, I
don't give a crap if they like me or not, you wanna give them medals for
it go ahead. Second, what the hell are they doing making judgments without
having read the material they are judging me on? What the hell is your
excuse for that?
> > Mark, there was no point from the beginning.
>
> And obviously, you're an *amoral* somebody. -_-
Thanks for judging me on this one single post and totally disregarding my
years of contributions in all fields to the newsgroup both before your own
time and during your time. You have turned out to be quite the shallow
jackass yourself Mark.
Kakarotto
> "Kakarotto" <kaka...@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
> > Die Stephen.
>
> Hmmm, I'm sensing a lot of hostility from you.
DIE!
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > "Kakarotto" <kaka...@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
> > > Die Stephen.
> >
> > Hmmm, I'm sensing a lot of hostility from you.
>
> DIE!
Hmm very simple form of hostility though. Not a lot of thought goes into
it, not very focused or intense at all. Almost like you don't really mean
it.
OnsenMark
<disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
>"OnsenMark" <locu...@aol.combatrock> wrote:
>> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
>> > No Mark you are not thinking.
>>
>> I *AM* thinking. And you're STILL rationalizing.
>
>No you are reacting and of course I am being rational. Tell me where it
>says that rational thinking is bad.
>
I'm sorry, I thought being amoral was bad. I guess my parents just raised me
too right.
>> > Bottom line is I have not done anything wrong. I have not done
>anything
>> > that I don't have the right to do. When you put your information on a
>> > public forum you are giving the public the right to do with it what
>they
>> > wish to. You are effectively handing it out to everyone.
>>
>> Where does it SAY you can? Tell me this, please. And if this is the
>case, then
>> why don't you put your mailing address out there for the world to see?
>
>Tell me where it says I can't do it! That's the world for you, the law
>tells you what you can't do not what you can do. If I waited for
>permission to do anything I'd sit here and starve to death.
>
So it's okay for you to go ahead, take someone's mailing address, and post it
to a newsgroup? I'm sorry, but no matter how many ways you flavor it, I still
don't buy it, and I never will. Maybe it's because I'm more of a *decent human
being* than you will probably ever be.
And by the way, I'm pretty sure there's an UNWRITTEN law about what you did,
but apparently you consider yourself above the law.
>> > If they got it from the same source or some other public forum I'd be
>> > fine. It's my own fault for putting it there and if I did put it there
>I
>> > know what the consequences are. You and anyone else are free to look
>it up
>> > and post it. Hell I'll do it for you if you like, but I do keep the
>> > information up to date as I've done a bit of moving lately.
>>
>> Disregard the previous comment. Still, that's no excuse to do what you
>did, no
>> matter the reason. But evidently you're amoral, so, oh fucking well.
>
>Oh no no no Mark! I'm not going to disregard it just because suddenly you
>feel like you are loosing your grounds for arguing. No you lost that one
>as you should realize that you are loosing it everywhere else.
>
And you've got such a mad-on for your own voice, I'm surprised this is still
japan.anime.evangelion, and NOT "alt.fan.disaster".
>> > If I were the ISP I'd be telling you it's your own damn fault for
>> > releasing the info in the first place.
>
>No comment here? Why not? Maybe you got nothing to work with eh?
>
Enjoying the sound of your own voice?
>> > No, that would up the numbers a little. Say 4? I don't know have you
>> > counted?
>>
>> Of course, everyone that has commented in my post on LiveJournal about
>this so
>> far agrees with me, basically stating that it was absolutely the wrong
>thing to
>> do, no matter what. Maybe I should also point them to the relevant
>threads on
>> Google, and let them judge for themselves further. But suffice it to say
>that
>> they don't like you.
>
>LiveJournal? You talking to a bunch of other people about what I have
>done? So you are farming judgments on me behind my back are you? First, I
>don't give a crap if they like me or not, you wanna give them medals for
>it go ahead. Second, what the hell are they doing making judgments without
>having read the material they are judging me on? What the hell is your
>excuse for that?
>
Ever hear of a second opinion? Probably not, since you think you're always
right.
>> > Mark, there was no point from the beginning.
>>
>> And obviously, you're an *amoral* somebody. -_-
>
>Thanks for judging me on this one single post and totally disregarding my
>years of contributions in all fields to the newsgroup both before your own
>time and during your time. You have turned out to be quite the shallow
>jackass yourself Mark.
I'm shallow? Why, because I think what you did is immoral and irreprehensible?
Because I could never sink to such disgusting levels as you? Because no one is
willing to stand up and say, in no uncertain terms, "NO!" to the "Great"
Disaster?
Man, I used to think you were cool. Now I see you for the piece of crap you
*really* are.
I'm outta here. Enjoy your victory, you stinking pile of dung. >_<
Disaster
> "Disaster" <disa...@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net> writes:
> > No you are reacting and of course I am being rational. Tell me where
it
> > says that rational thinking is bad.
>
> I'm sorry, I thought being amoral was bad. I guess my parents just
raised me
> too right.
I thought this was further down?
> > Tell me where it says I can't do it! That's the world for you, the law
> > tells you what you can't do not what you can do. If I waited for
> > permission to do anything I'd sit here and starve to death.
>
> So it's okay for you to go ahead, take someone's mailing address, and
post it
> to a newsgroup? I'm sorry, but no matter how many ways you flavor it, I
still
> don't buy it, and I never will. Maybe it's because I'm more of a *decent
human
> being* than you will probably ever be.
If that person has made public the information then yes, it's okay. I
didn't let it out into the public they did. I don't need to flavor it, I
have the facts to back me up.
> And by the way, I'm pretty sure there's an UNWRITTEN law about what you
did,
> but apparently you consider yourself above the law.
Think about what you just said Mark, an unwritten law? So it's not been
written, thus it doesn't exist and/or has no weight in society. Not only
am I above such a thing, so is every other human being in the world. Stop
arguing you are starting to make yourself look like an idiot.
> > Oh no no no Mark! I'm not going to disregard it just because suddenly
you
> > feel like you are loosing your grounds for arguing. No you lost that
one
> > as you should realize that you are loosing it everywhere else.
>
> And you've got such a mad-on for your own voice, I'm surprised this is
still
> japan.anime.evangelion, and NOT "alt.fan.disaster".
Who are you Morgan in disguise?
> Enjoying the sound of your own voice?
Recognized the sound of irrational stupidity coming from your mouth yet?
> > LiveJournal? You talking to a bunch of other people about what I have
> > done? So you are farming judgments on me behind my back are you?
First, I
> > don't give a crap if they like me or not, you wanna give them medals
for
> > it go ahead. Second, what the hell are they doing making judgments
without
> > having read the material they are judging me on? What the hell is your
> > excuse for that?
>
> Ever hear of a second opinion? Probably not, since you think you're
always
> right.
What is this, a doctors exam now? You are aware of course that a second
opinion is only gotten when the same info is presented. Otherwise it's a
corrupt and invalid opinion when used for the same event.
> > Thanks for judging me on this one single post and totally disregarding
my
> > years of contributions in all fields to the newsgroup both before your
own
> > time and during your time. You have turned out to be quite the shallow
> > jackass yourself Mark.
>
> I'm shallow? Why, because I think what you did is immoral and
irreprehensible?
> Because I could never sink to such disgusting levels as you? Because no
one is
> willing to stand up and say, in no uncertain terms, "NO!" to the "Great"
> Disaster?
Everyone has at one time stood up and shouted no Mark. It's hardly a fad
anymore. No Mark as I said, you are a shallow jackass because you twisting
the question to get the result you want. You present me in a bad light so
obviously those you are asking are going to consider me in a bad light.
> Man, I used to think you were cool. Now I see you for the piece of crap
you
> *really* are.
Several years and you make a judgement like this? You are not Mark!
> I'm outta here. Enjoy your victory, you stinking pile of dung. >_<
Yeah, good on you who ever you are. I hope Mark gets his account back
soon.
Olivier Hagué
wrote:
>I'm outta here.
'Leaving too.
Michael Wignall
news:3d6c32da...@news.noos.fr...
From this point on I'm just blocking all these threads
and putting Disaster on ignore.