IMHO the implementation of a Gremlin way to manage schemas does
not provide a major benefit unless it's somewhat standardized in
Tinkerpop.
An HTTP API would have the benefit of making the schema management available to users of the Gremlin server without the mentioned problems for making it accessible via Gremlin. As it would just expose the underlying Java API (current or a new one), it would be nice if the web service would be optional if JG is used embedded.
nik..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JanusGraph developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to janusgraph-de...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/janusgraph-dev/8495bf4a-ad48-4df8-ab34-e45883c92186%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/janusgraph-dev/8104d7ae-6cb7-bb90-05e3-c87dd1e22970%40digitician.eu.
An HTTP API would have the benefit of making the schema management available to users of the Gremlin server without the mentioned problems for making it accessible via Gremlin. As it would just expose the underlying Java API (current or a new one), it would be
nice if the web service would be optional if JG is used embedded.