Hello all,
I'm new to the group and I was thinking about modifying a Kontakt Kontrol s88 keyboard into a Lippens keyboard by 3d printing some keys.
Mr Lippens kindly offered to send me some keys for 3d scanning etc but upon examining the keybed mechanism of the Kontrol I'm a bit less confident that this can be done well.
The keybed is a fatar TP/100LR
http://www.fatar.com/pages/TP100LR.html#
Fully weighted
but with this connection between key and hammer:
From flickr user James Fry:
“In this photo I have removed one of the keys (much easier than on any other Fatar keyboard I've seen - the key simply slides forward a few millimetres and then upwards away from the frame) to show the hammer actuation mechanism.
Unlike the more expensive keyboards, there is no escapement mechanism so the key is permanently attached to the hammer. It is also hinged quite close to the back of the key which increases the force required to play the back of the keys. This can all help increase the effort required to play, increasing fatigue and might be why some people dislike the action - though personally I prefer it to most out there, and it is extremely lightweight!”
Mr Lippens provided these useful measurements for his keyboard:
“The distance between keys is such that an octave span is about 5.9 inches [14.986cm], compared to 6.5 inches on a standard piano keyboard. The depth of the key bed, from front to back, is 5.875 inches, about .375 inch larger than the standard piano keyboard.”
F.Y.I. The Chromatone octave width is approximately 14 cm.
I thought I'd call upon the Janko braintrust for advice. I think Ivaylo Naydenov tried 3d printing some keys and I know Omar Soriano has tried the Lippens for himself, and a few of you Janko geniuses probably have a good understanding of how a longer Lippens key would affect the hammer action.
Obviously with this kind of modification I would lose the decreased octavespan and the keys would have different actuation forces.
An alternative is fitting Lippens keys onto a Chromatone, but then I lose all the bells and whistles of the Kontrol. Or I could try an overlay. But if you’re going to 3d print something it might as well be actual keys.
And as a side question, to people who have tried both Jankos and Chromatones: do you find the dipped angle of the keys on the Chromatone to be ergonomic at all? Does it change the actuation force of keys?
Does anyone know the keybed mechanism of the Chromatone? Is it hammers, or springs or parallelogram arms?
Thanks in advance,
James Weston
Thanks for this, Joe
You’re a godsend.
I wanted to see the inner workings of the Chromatone. Sorry it was so shoddy. I think in general one ends up regretting the cheaper purchases with audio gear. It looks like I’m just going to have to wait 3-5 years and save up for the mass production of the Lippens... Time to do some vocal training and work on a multimedia music textbook.
I’m hoping the vertical/horizontal space trade-off on the Lippens makes it easier to play complex chords than on the Janko. But then there’s the up&over and slotting-in movement of the fingers to get in between their interwoven keys – certainly better than piano but is it better than the standard Janko? There’s always trade-off trade-offs trade-offs. I’d really like to see Paul Vandervoort take a whirl on the Lippens. I don't like their concave keys but that's a pretty fixable problem.
I’ve concluded that the 7:5 traditional colouring may be enticing to traditional piano players but it’s pretty much worthless on a 6:6 keyboard and on a Janko it’s insanity. You can’t have a colour switch rows/semitones because it’s totally disorientating.
I attached some mockups following that rule.
Obviously they should all be overlaid with the Pertichik
tricolour system ;)
I think the 2-2-2-6 one is the easiest to read.
But I’m going to run with the polychromatic monstrosity that is the 5 colour Pertchik (1-1-2-2-2). Every note in the octave has a colour-combination which is unique to it and if you feel like colourcoding your notation it’s highly readable on a Twinline staff.