Frank
unread,May 17, 2013, 3:03:43 AM5/17/13Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Sign in to report message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Jangaroo Users
Hi Steven,
you are right, this has to be documented.
For the time being, I'd suggest to use the latest jangaroo-tools and
jangaroo-libs 1.0.x. This version uses the build process / packaging
documented on the web site and in the Wiki and it still maintain
(contains all fixes).
The only improvements in Jangaroo 2 are in the build process and
packaging format. It is only really an advantage if you (like
CoreMedia) deploy the Jangaroo application in a Java Application
Server like Tomcat or Jetty, not if you use a static web server like
Apache. Because the packaging and dependency format is incompatible to
Jangaroo 1, we chose a new major version. So it is rather Jangaroo A
and B.
Jangaroo 3 will be the next "big thing" and as soon as the first
preview release is available, I'll blog about it. The main features
are that it will rely on RequireJS for class loading and WebJars for
including JavaScript libraries, and the Runtime has been revamped
based on ECMAScript 5 (but is still working in IE < 9 thanks to ES5-
polyfills).
Greetings
-Frank-