This is a money laundry although not as big as it could be.
Considering the location of waterfront building, ocean waves, creek currents and Seagate gated community the Site 2b is easier to navigate and it's closer to the road which means car-carrying ferry which is another set of challenges. Ocean side has challenging waves. Anything North of North Shore is not within the walking distance from target real estate. Seagate residents are unlikely to give up their beaches and allow thru traffic.
I guess Site 2a was chosen to allow for more work and therefore more kickback. Terminal at Site 2b will also resuspended sediment during pile driving and ferry operation but at least it does not require upfront dredging. I speculate that due to volatile shoreline Site 2b would still require occasional dredging.
As an alternative, the ferry terminal could be constructed off of an already reinforced Calvert Vaux shoreline right across from Site 2b and connected with the South Shore via pedestrian bridge
which is supposed to improve pedestrian access to Calvert Vaux park
. Or terminal can be a part of a bridge.
From a commuter perspective a 30 minute ride interval may work for Long Island (like they have a choice) but not for NYC hectic lifestyle where a 12 minute wait time is an opportunity to take a lunch break. So considering an equal probability of entering the departure queue within this 30 minute interval the average travel time will be 37 + (30/2) = 52 minutes +- 15 minutes of luck. This variability will either add more stress to stick to the ferry schedule or will require allocation of 67 minutes which is about the same as bus+train commute. So what's the gain? Cool trend?
This project will not benefit existing residents because I speculate that not a lot of them commute to Wall Street on a daily basis.
If there would be more money to launder or better money-laundering capacity of a construction company then a pier behind a wave breaker would be planned on the ocean side.
There are 3 ways to resist and all of them require mobilization of the concerned population which could be done via street ads, environmental outlets and social media.
- Good old petitions, calls, public hearings and so on.
- Litigation. Broken rules are to be fixed in court.
- Social pressure. Expose this situation to potential buyers using social media, website positioned for real estate keywords and street advertisement.
By street ads I mean
flyers and corrugated plastic yard signs installed by activists.