Hide modules with N/A coverage

[Carmine Vincenzo Russo]

Hello everyone,

This is what I have right now https://imgur.com/ozqNcAB, as you can see my report has both modules with 0% and N/A on Missed Instructions and Missed Branches.

Obviously the 0% results are helpful and I want to keep them, even if they have a 0% and a N/A, but modules with N/A in both columns can I hide them in some way? I don't really need them to be there. 

Therefore I was wondering if there is a way to hide the modules that have N/A in both Missed columns just in the report, I want to keep them in the pom files, this way if anything changes and they get a percentage they will show automatically.

Thanks,

Carmine

--

Carmine Vincenzo Russo

[Marc Hoffmann]

Hi Carmine,

just to be sure: what tool are you exactly using to create the report?

Regards,
-marc

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jacoco+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/CAA6KdKeroyK335VH2G4i9qL-%2Byw_C5OsT3Wmhmf6V38LjT-fsw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Carmine Vincenzo Russo]

Sorry, i forgot to add this.

I am using Maven for a java project, so I'm doing everything with pom.xml files. 

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/17442bf8aef58085604ab07fa58a0a59%40mountainminds.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

Carmine Vincenzo Russo

[Marc Hoffmann]

So you're using JaCoCo's report-aggregate goal?

Is there public repo have a look at your build configuration?

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/CAA6KdKf2iU-4QQMJEELzttX8XrhqwXLPeVop-Ywq1ZMShRX00A%40mail.gmail.com.

[Carmine Vincenzo Russo]

Hi Marc,

So you're using JaCoCo's report-aggregate goal?

Yes, that's exactly what I am using. 

Is there public repo have a look at your build configuration?

Unfortunately I am working in a local repo.

This is the pom I use for the report-aggregate: https://pastebin.com/FWmnLEZt

And this is the configuration for the agent: https://pastebin.com/fNxHWczJ

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/2304a25fa6717d24ff28c411e970bb34%40mountainminds.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

Carmine Vincenzo Russo

[Marc Hoffmann]

Hi Carmine,

I just discussed your request Evgeny and we came up with the following remarks/questions:

1) There can be various configuration mistakes which can lead to empty coverage reports for some modules. If we “magically” hide them from the report this will hide such configuration errors and might confuse user.

2) If you explicitly list the modules, what exactly is the problem to have them visible in the report (even if empty)?

Regards,

-marc

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/CAA6KdKd9CvXztfDPb36VZEBZ91CznW3BJFiF25o%3DvMFvRnTsow%40mail.gmail.com.

[Carmine Vincenzo Russo]

Hi Marc

 

I just discussed your request Evgeny and we came up with the following remarks/questions:

Thank you for putting your time into this.

 

1) There can be various configuration mistakes which can lead to empty coverage reports for some modules. If we “magically” hide them from the report this will hide such configuration errors and might confuse user.

I understand this clearly, and I don't want them to disappear magically.

 

2) If you explicitly list the modules, what exactly is the problem to have them visible in the report (even if empty)?

More than anything else, it was a curiosity. I was wondering, as I said before, if there was the possibility to hide it, I really don't need it, as you said it could help find configuration errors. I was just discussing all the N/A results with a colleague and if it was better to have them all for a clearer and more comprehensive report instead of removing them from the report.

I understand you now, of course, and it is much better to have everything visible for a complete overview of the coverage, I will simply remove the modules from the list if we don't really need them in the report.

Thanks again,

Carmine

 

Regards,

-marc

--

Carmine Vincenzo Russo

[Marc Hoffmann]

Hi Carmine,

thanks for coming back with clarification of your use case! Such feedback really helps us to set priorities for JaCoCo's features.

Regards,

-marc

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jacoco+un...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/CAA6KdKdu2JozHghYOtUGeO6M-TVwdT2kT3%2BpifQ7BYBD8-PdTg%40mail.gmail.com.