Support for additionalParameters = false at all levels

[Aditya Pal]

Hi,

I believe this is a common enough use case when people want to restrict additional properties in every layer of their schema. Currently,  I found that there is a way to do it to each individual object, but not directly for an object that may have nested objects and so forth.

Is there a reason this is not supported? If this is due to a lack of interest or something similar, I can help contribute :)

---

Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

[Tatu Saloranta]

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 3:15 PM 'Aditya Pal' via jackson-user
<jackso...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I believe this is a common enough use case when people want to restrict additional properties in every layer of their schema. Currently, I found that there is a way to do it to each individual object, but not directly for an object that may have nested objects and so forth.
>
> Is there a reason this is not supported? If this is due to a lack of interest or something similar, I can help contribute :)

I think you will need to explain in a bit more detail what you mean
here, regarding existing functionality, partly since term schema
could mean a few things.

-+ Tatu +-