I have some actual failure data where a machine state is sampled every second over the course of 24 hours. These state flags in the data allow me to calculate the time between failures (TBF) and time to recover (TTR) for each unplanned stoppage. The TBF follows a 2 parameter Weibull distribution, and the TTR can be approximated nicely with a Lognormal distribution.
In Jaamsim, the Weibull distribution is straightforward, and when I use an expression logger to capture the simulated breakdowns, an analysis of these data yields Weibull parameters that fall nicely between the confidence intervals for the estimates of the real data - so far so good.
Where I'm having trouble is with the Lognormal distribution in Jaamsim. In my data, the Scale (alpha) parameter is -0.53, but Jaamsim will not accept a number less than zero here. A negative scale is a valid input for a lognormal distribution (and when I transform the TTR data to ln(TTR) I get a normal distribution with a mean of -0.53, sigma of 0.858.
The Shape (sigma) parameter does seem to be working, as the simulated output reproduces this value within the confidence limits - this occurs when I enter the Shape Parameter from the real data's PDF (in this case, 0.858) into the NormalStandardDeviation field in Jaamsim.
I tried entering -0.53 for the NormalMean field - but that resulted in an output of the simulated TTR data with a Scale Parameter of -4.64, so I'm interpreting that field wrong.
I've attached an image of the Lognormal PDF from the actual data. I'm using SAS JMP to fit the distributions. How would this be properly mapped to the Jammsim Lognormal distribution input editor?
Thanks!
Lloyd