The measurements depend on the intended use of the spinnaker, which
is typically coded as A2, A3, A4, A5, etc. Odd numbers tend to be
aimed at different reaching conditions and even numbers targeted
toward maximum downwind VMG (running). Larger numbers are designed
for stronger winds. I'm guessing John wants an A2 (typical "all
purpose" spinnaker if you're only having one).
There can be endless debate about the best size and shape, which is
not what I intend to spur here. Just an understanding of how the
measurements relate to the intended use. Here are the numbers for
an A3 and an A2 that I had at one point on Thin Man.
I've seen A2's for the J/92 ranging anywhere from 84sqm to 93sqm
(mine). I ultimately replaced this particular A2 with a slightly
smaller one which was a scaled down version of a very successful
J/109 A2 design from UK. It measured in at 89sqm. The old one simply
had too much leech and not enough luff.
For comparison, this A3 was an AMAZING reaching kite, but I couldn't
sail lower than about 145 TWA with it.
Longer luff generally translates into better rotation of the
spinnaker to windward leading to better ability to sail deep, at the
cost of reduced performance when reaching. It's a trade-off. Longer
leech gives more sail area, which is good for reaching (to a point,
same as an overlapping genoa), but not much help when running since
it's the luff that generates the power.
|
A3 |
A2 |
SLU |
44.8 |
45.8 |
SLE |
37.1 |
38.0 |
SF |
25.0 |
27.7 |
SMG |
21.3 |
28.7 |
A. Area (sq ft)
|
752.5 |
995.2 |
|
|
|
Area (sq m)
|
69.9 |
92.5 |
Long story short, a 613sqft spinnaker is going to be a disappointing
sail for a J/92 A2. If you're racing, aim for 900-950sqft. If you're
cruising 800-850sqft would probably be a good balance.
Best regards,
Todd
J/99 #24 Thin Man