Fwd: seniority list of JTS
Patanjali Prakash
From: S K Bhalla <skb...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:57 PM
Subject: seniority list of JTS
To: Ravindra Verma <rverm...@gmail.com>, vish dheer <er_vish...@yahoo.co.in>, Patanjali Prakash <er.pat...@gmail.com>, Mayank Mrinal <mayank...@gmail.com>, harmit...@gmail.com, avadhesh singh <singhava...@gmail.com>, Aftab Alam <aftab5...@gmail.com>, Ram Manohar <manoha...@gmail.com>
Dear All
In case you have to make any representation on your seniority, do so within stipulated period.
S.K. Bhalla
Director (NTI-I)
National Telecommunications Institute for Policy Research, Innovation & Training
Department of Telecommunications,
Ministry of Communications & IT, Government of India
ALT campus, Ghaziabad-201002
With Regards
Assistant Divisional Engineer Telecom
National Telecommunication Institute for Policy Research Innovation and Training
Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Govt. of India,
ALTTC Campus, Ghaziabad-201 002
“Have the courage to say no. Have the courage to face the truth. Do the right thing because it is right. These are the magic keys to living your life with integrity.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patanjali Prakash
Dear friends,
its urgent, kindly response immediately
Kindly read the para 3 of the attached letter. It would clearify the rule position for producing senority list. Althrough it seems old one but no additional amendment comes in basic structure.
Tommarow, I would get clearification on following points:
1. Yearwise vacancies generated in JTS scale.
2. What would be promotional year and ratio or % of. Direct recruitees and promotees.
3. Why all the recruties r not promoted in same year? If adequate vacancies was not available then why not followed with this batch, why those r regulated on 30-12-2011 r interlaced with 2010 batch recruites.
If Probable answer relates to year of result declaration of its 2010 batch, then year would consider as 2011, then in this case all promotees of 2011 r to be interlaced with whole batch.
Kindly read this, and whatever additional info u want to ask, send me before 1100hrs of 19-02-2013.
Call me on 8585954469, 9420476128
------
Patanjali