DSUB extension supplement markup issues

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Gregorio Canal

unread,
Jul 14, 2022, 10:32:52 AM7/14/22
to itico...@googlegroups.com
Dear comittee,
 i was looking at the currently published 
And i noticed that it contains all the markup changes bold striked  etc.. also in sections that belongs to this supplement and not to normative text ( see ITI-69 and ITI-70)
image.png

Is it an error that we made during the publication process in 2019 or is there a reason it was published this way? Do we need to do a clean up process?

Kind Regards
Gregorio
--
Gregorio Canal
Standardization and Testing Area | Arsenàl.IT
Team Leader unità Standard
M. +39 3386677556 | S. gregorio.canal

John Moehrke

unread,
Jul 14, 2022, 10:40:04 AM7/14/22
to itico...@googlegroups.com, Gregorio Canal
This is normal for a supplement. Supplements are changes to the Technical Framework. Thus each section needs to explain that it is changing the Volume 1, Volume 2, or Volume 3.  This is true of all supplements.

John Moehrke 🔥 Architect: Healthcare Informatics Standards - Interoperability, Privacy, and Security
IHE Co-Chair IT Infrastructure Planning and Technical
HL7 Co-Chair Security WG, FHIR FMG, FHIR facilitator, and 
FHIR Foundation founding member
Employee of By Light -- Contractor to VHA MyHealtheVet
JohnM...@gmail.com  |  M +1 920-564-2067  |  John.M...@bylight.com
 https://healthcaresecprivacy.blogspot.com



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iticomments" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to iticomments...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iticomments/CALqztJOz%3DZqxLW5gpoNOR_YyhfWZvzN6%3Ds6jxRzW2JC_f0dKVg%40mail.gmail.com.

Gregorio Canal

unread,
Jul 14, 2022, 11:36:09 AM7/14/22
to John Moehrke, itico...@googlegroups.com
Jhon i agree that it is normal for a supplement if the supplement change normative text, but not if it adds a whole new section, otherwise the whole section should be bold underlined.
The DSUB extension supplement modify iti-52 but adds ITI-69 and ITI-70 thus i would expect that ITI-69 and ITI-70 does not have tracked changes because the whole sections are new.

Gregorio
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages