In California, una stazione di ricarica per auto elettriche Tesla Supercharger ha un generatore Diesel ad alimentare le colonnine

pirex

unread,

Oct 21, 2023, 4:51:10 AM10/21/23

to

https://www.motorbox.com/auto/magazine/vivere-auto/tesla-supercharger-alimentati-a-gasolio-in-california

https://is.gd/upUFZT

Roberto Deboni DMIsr

unread,

Oct 21, 2023, 5:17:31 AM10/21/23

to

Finto scandalo da parte di ignoranti come capre e cretini:

<https://thedriven.io/2018/12/14/diesel-charge-evs-remote-locations-greener-than-you-think/>

A "... a solution that may solve this issue for transcontinental travellers,
at least until solar powered stations become the norm."

"Edwards and a group of fellow EV drivers gathered last week to test out
whether powering an EV charger – in this case, a Tritium Veefil
50kW DC charger – with diesel would be not only a reliable solution,
but whether the amount of diesel used is at least comparable to that of
a diesel-fuelled car."

"Self-funding the project with an inexpensive diesel generator and the
EV charger from Tritium, Edwards bolted the two together, dubbed it
the “ChargePod”, and invited a number of EV drivers out to his
property in Perth to test it out."

"Chair of the Tesla Owner’s Club of WA (TOCWA) and AEVA WA branch member
Rob Dean joined Jon in the tests, which took place in Perth, with
10 EV drivers total with Tesla Model S and X EVs, attending to assist
in the test."

“They want to travel longer distances and …. like the idea of not doing
any more damage [to the environment],” he tells The Driven.

Notare la ratio, da chiarire agli idioti, altrimenti la nenia
non finisce mai:

"He stresses that the point is not to offer a diesel-powered EV charger
as the final solution, but as a reliable stop gap until installation of
batteries and renewable-powered EV chargers become financially viable."

Risultato della prova:

"Running the charger for 9 hours and 15 minutes and consuming 108.6 litres
of diesel to charge the 10 EVs, the results came in: a total energy
consumption (as recorded by the EV power management systems) of
368.4kWh delivered at an average rate of 3.392 kWh/litre."

"Converted to standard fuel consumption figures using the lifetime average
kWh per kilometre, the BMW i3 came in as the most efficient, recording a
fuel consumption rate of 4.392 litres/100km – about the same fuel
efficiency as a diesel BMW 3 series."

Ma se il confronto si estende a pari categoria:

"The Tesla models, while scoring higher than the BMW i3 (between 5.011 to
6.014 L/100km for the Model S and 5.689 to 6.957 L/100km for the Model X)
came significantly under similarly sized vehicles in their range (for
example, a diesel Holden Commodore does 5.7 litres/100km while a
VW Touareg diesel SUV does 7.2 litres/100km)."

Grafica della tabella:

<https://b2232832.smushcdn.com/2232832/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Charging-Trial-figures.jpg?lossy=1&strip=0&webp=1>

Il problema non e' avere avuto dei dubbi sulla pratica, sia come riserva
sia per localita' remote, dove stendere dei cavi apposta di maggiore
potenza costerebbe tanto anche in termini di emissioni di CO2, ma il
fatto che gli idioti dell'articolo abbia usato un tono scandalistico,
come se fosse pacificamente una "vergogna" o una "menzogna" di qualche
promotore del "verde", quando invece:

"But is it green? It’s better than putting diesel in a car, says Edwards,
because the constant running rate of the gennie uses the fuel more
efficiently than idling and accelerating in a car."

AC

unread,

Oct 21, 2023, 7:12:01 AM10/21/23

to

pirex dice:

> In California, una stazione di ricarica per auto elettriche Tesla
> Supercharger ha un generatore Diesel ad alimentare le colonnine
>

Fantastico!
e come diceva il saggio, se è vero allora è una bella bugia.

--
Augusto

Enzo Lombardo

unread,

Oct 21, 2023, 8:35:17 AM10/21/23

to

Roberto Deboni DMIsr <ne...@analisienergie.it> wrote:

> On 2023-10-21, pirex <pi...@mein.gmx> wrote:
> > In California, una stazione di ricarica per auto elettriche
> > Tesla Supercharger ha un generatore Diesel ad alimentare le colonnine

il titolo in effetti è fuorviante.

>
> Notare la ratio, da chiarire agli idioti, altrimenti la nenia
> non finisce mai:
>
> "He stresses that the point is not to offer a diesel-powered EV charger
> as the final solution, but as a reliable stop gap until installation of
> batteries and renewable-powered EV chargers become financially viable."
>

traduciamo per i francofoni... :-)

Sottolinea che il punto non è offrire un caricabatterie per veicoli
elettrici alimentati a diesel come soluzione finale, ma come soluzione
affidabile finchè l'installazione di batterie e caricabatterie per
veicoli elettrici alimentati da fonti rinnovabil diventeranno
finanziariamente sostenibili."

L'importante che non si una scusa per abusarne,
Beh, in Italia potrebbe essere... :-)

--
Enzo Lombardo
~~~~~~~~~~~~ wind ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ wave ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fun ...