Il 01/04/2018 01:35, Allen ha scritto:
> Daniele Pinna <
dan...@oops.dapinna.com> wrote in news:p9p1gt$56g$1
> @
virtdiesel.mng.cu.mi.it:
>
>> ma comunque non funziona!
>>
>
> Il log che dice?
>
Ecco il log:
Ovviamente al posto di ip_ufficio e ip_casa ci sono gli IP (risolti
regolarmente dal
no-ip.org)
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec ERROR ARS 002 - Phase I negotiation failed for
peer ip_ufficio[500]
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec ERROR [ip_ufficio] ERROR: failed to
pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec ERROR [ip_ufficio] ERROR: failed to get valid
proposal.
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec ERROR ERROR: no suitable proposal found.
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec INFO [ip_ufficio] INFO: Selected NAT-T
version: RFC 3947
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID:
draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID:
draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID:
draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID:
draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID: DPD
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec INFO INFO: begin Identity Protection mode.
01/04/2018 10:59:36 IPsec INFO INFO: respond new phase 1 negotiation:
ip_casa[500]<=>ip_ufficio[500]
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec ERROR ARS 002 - Phase I negotiation failed for
peer ip_ufficio[500]
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec ERROR [ip_ufficio] ERROR: failed to get valid
proposal.
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec ERROR ERROR: no suitable proposal found.
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec INFO [ip_ufficio] INFO: Selected NAT-T
version: RFC 3947
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID:
draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID:
draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID:
draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID:
draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec INFO INFO: received Vendor ID: DPD
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec INFO INFO: begin Identity Protection mode.
01/04/2018 10:59:26 IPsec INFO INFO: respond new phase 1 negotiation:
ip_casa[500]<=>ip_ufficio[500]
Sicuramente c'è qualche impostazione differente o non compatibile tra i
due Router... il problema è capire quale :-\