Though it seems as though the term “informal learning” has found a new life, it’s actually been around for centuries. It has passed the test of time from old world storytelling to hands-on vocational training, but learning organizations are often resistant to embrace it. “Fill rates” and “percentage of employees trained” are comfortable statistics, but they lack luster, depth and any suggestion of importance or impact to executive leadership. And, while we knew for decades that people learned from each other at the water cooler, on the phone and inside meetings, technology has made the discussion of informal learning a whole new conversation. The question becomes, “We know it happens, but how do we measure it?”
Over the course of my career, I have often had to decide what metrics mattered to the executives in the enterprise where I was employed. What truly matters depends on the priorities and the size of the company, but there are a few recommendations that I have made repeatedly related to capturing informal learning and turning it into measurements that count.
Creating a teaching culture and making it measurable
An organization whose people are learning at the pace of change is going to be more successful, in a faster timeframe, than an organization that cannot keep up. With a continually changing marketplace, new products and cutting-edge technologies that drive productivity or sales, having up-to-date employees is critical to an organization’s success.
To create such a learning organization, you have to build a teaching culture. A teaching culture is one that believes in recognizing and rewarding people for sharing how they achieve, what they know, how they learned it, and where they find information. An organization that fosters this culture will grow faster and make fewer mistakes than an organization that does not.
An enterprise does not need one best sales person, they need dozens or hundreds or thousands who understand that they are not competing against each other, but rather, against other companies. The same applies to engineering, support and each functional job in the company — needing an army of great people. High potential “stars” and other successful people empowering their peers is a real winning strategy.
When discussing measurement – harness this culture and use tools that provide reliable use data.
Encouraging employees to create content based on their successes and failures
I have recommended decentralizing content creation for almost 20 years, but these days it is easy. Content creation tools finally exist that make it easy for anyone who is an expert to share knowledge. They work well for anyone who has experienced some success and wants to share it with partners, colleagues and employees looking for a new or different way to be successful.
With wikis, blogs, audio-over-slides, video, and social networking tools, learning organizations can manage public forums where knowledge is openly shared. Peer-to-peer teaching tools require training organizations to give up some control of the content creation process, but these tools also increase the accessibility and speed by which content can be updated or corrected.
Professionals want to learn tips, tricks, and techniques from successful peers in their community. They don’t really want to listen to scripted “talent”, or to professional trainers. Those tips and tricks should be brief, focused knowledge nuggets that are two, five, seven or 10 minutes long. Short, direct, and specific answers or coaching comments that teach professionals how to be successful, how to approach a situation or customer, address different vertical markets, or solve any other narrow problem are immensely impactful. They are also easily searched within a database and are much more easily updated and replaced than courses, white papers or one-hour video segments. Decentralize content creation and you will capitalize on a scalable formula of successful informal learning.
The beauty of wikis, blogs, message boards and other knowledge-sharing tools is the ability to monitor, track and measure their success. How many people are searching for specific topics? How many best practices are being shared and how are improvements being realized in that area? What questions are prevalent that can be addressed company-wide and what are the results once they are answered? It’s as if we’ve recorded water cooler conversations, put them in one place and have the ability to effectively respond to questions raised.
Measuring and reporting the right metrics
I am fond of this back-to-basics reminder. There are only three reasons for companies to have a training function:
If you cannot show that kind of impact, they are likely the wrong metrics. When tracking informal learning, how are people communicating about these objectives? How are people learning from others and becoming more productive? Where are people learning tricks that save time and money? What best practices are being shared about how to keep customers happy? You will have the attention of executives when correlating informal learning activities with solid metrics that support these objectives.
Research
Expertus and Training industry, Inc.’s research on “Measuring Learning as Budgets Tighten” included 84 corporate and government training professionals in organizations with varying sizes throughout 19 industries.
The study had many interesting findings, including:
Since far more training budgets are decreasing than increasing, there is heightened importance in demonstrating the impact of training spending through effective measurements. There are traditional measurement tools that should be reevaluated and updated, but it also opens up the discussion for measuring informal learning. It can even be less expensive than traditional training if you encourage people to talk, share and ask questions.
Everything can be tracked in some shape or form, but measurement can be perplexing. When framing your thoughts around how to implement measurement techniques, here is my advice.
Top Five Thoughts on Measurement
Informal training is rapidly overtaking “formal” training in its importance to the learner community, so it is time for us to embrace and leverage that capability. I highly recommend some paradigm shifts within organizations that are still using old ways of learning and traditional measurement techniques.
Tom Kelly has more than 25 years of experience in the education and training industry and has held executive and leadership positions at NetApp , Cisco, Oracle Corporation, Sun Microsystems, NeXT Corporation and Control Data Corporation. He is also co-author of The Business Case for E-Learning. Tom is currently a trusted advisor for a growing list of clients, including small to mid-sized companies focusing on learning organizations, systems, and strategies.
Written for TrainingIndustry.com