I once spent a few hours with Mother Teresa also and gave her a Gita. That also is a blessing and I felt fortunate to meet a very pure soul.
Ys,
Bhaktadasa
Sent from my Nokia phone
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Jay
Sent: 04/07/2010 8:40:00 AM
Cc: Bhaktatraveler; Pratyatosa; markm...@yahoo.com; lak...@webtv.net; yasod...@yahoo.com; sudhras...@gmail.com; urdh...@aol.com; ange...@yahoo.com; miloni...@yahoo.com; cc...@yahoo.com; das...@streamyx.com; hanto...@hotmail.com; magf...@wowway.com; istag...@googlegroups.com; amey...@gmail.com; mahesh...@yahoo.co.uk; Prabhupada Disciples
Subject: Not meant as a put down!
Dear Ajamila prabhu ji, PAMHO AGTSP
On Jul 3, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Ajamila (das) ACBSP (Goloka Books - UK) wrote:
>> HARI BOL!
>>
>> Those who missed the chance of hearing about KRSNA from Srila B.V. Puri
>> Goswami Maharaja are also unfortunate IMHO.
>
> So if a devotee goes through his whole life ONLY hearing about Krishna from
> Srila Prabhuopada he or she is unfortunate?
>
> I don't think so.
Neither do I. But then, that was not the point being made.
Please do not misunderstand the point. Or turn it into an offense. I am sure
Bhakta das did not mean it that way.
We are all unfortunate that we never lived in Bengal one hundred years back or
even 500 years back, what to speak of 5000 years back, because of the
personalities we could have met.
However that is also not the point being made.
One can have any number of siksha gurus. That is not limited in sastra.
QUOTE
A devotee must have only one initiating spiritual master because in the
scriptures acceptance of more than one is always forbidden. There is no limit,
however, to the number of instructing spiritual masters one may accept. CC Adi
1.35
END QUOTE
When someone feels fortunate by associating with a another Vaisnava (siksha
guru or not) it is only natural that he express such feelings that others are
unfortunate if they did not get a chance to associate with such a Vaisnava.
It is not meant as a put down of others one-pointed devotion to their chosen
guru(s) or Vaisnava associates.
your friend
Gaura Keshava das
PS Sorry this got cross-posted. Just wanted to clear this up.
--------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send an email to:
Prabhupada.Di...@pamho.net
Just a note:
Ajamila prabhu's statement was in response to Guru krpa prabhu's opinion that
"Those who missed the chance of hearing about KRSNA from Srila B.V. Puri
Goswami Maharaja are also unfortunate".
While I also got the holy & elevated sanga of Srila B.V. Puri
Goswami Maharaja, felt greatly blessed & honored by that physical sanga &
sorely lamented his recent tirobhava to Goloka, I am of the conviction that
those who have not yet received the physical sanga of such great saints as
Srila Prabhupada, Srila B.V. Puri Goswami Maharaja et al, should be considered
unfortunate by others who DID obtain such physical sanga with these saints.
Personally I would never promote the concept that one who has not had the
physical sanga of bygone saints is unfortunate in any way,
1. because the spiritual sanga of such saints can be acquired via hearing from
them or by their personal mercy and
2. because I do not think it is proper for aspirant vaisnavas to express such
ideas.
At the same time, it IS proper that we aspirant (or advanced) vaisnavas feel
themselves greatly unfortunate for losing or not having gotten the physical
sanga of either present or bygone saints. Our acaryas such as Srila Narottama
dasa Thakura, Srinivasa Thakura & Srila Ramanujacarya have lamented in this
way.
ys
ganesadasa
"... I am of the conviction that those who have not yet received the physical
sanga of such great saints as Srila Prabhupada, Srila B.V. Puri Goswami
Maharaja et al, should NOT be considered unfortunate by others who DID obtain
such physical sanga with these saints".
I was a little tired when I wrote it & didn't pay close enough attention to the
wording.
ys
ganesadasa
> Srila Prabhupada, Srila B.V. Puri Goswami Maharaja et al, should not be