All Glories to His Divine Grace Srila Prabhupada. Please accept my fallen obeisances.
A few points:
Serving devotees is one thing; serving cheaters another.
The overall ISKCON GBC is a body of cheaters. (Don't mistake my statement to mean that in regards to every single person on the GBC, because I don't know every single person on the GBC; thus, my statement in relation to the GBC body as a general overall body, and in regards to the specific GBC people I know personally, they are DIShonest, falling into the catagory of liars, cheaters, hypocrites, thieves, and [much] worse)
No need to get into the so many details of their purposeful cheating, criminality and "derailing" things. Simply taking a look at today's ISKCON, the damage is obvious, though hopefully these will only serve as "growing pains" which will eventually lead to a purified ISKCON; an ISKCON that Srila Prabhupada wanted.
Now, my question. What’s with all the pessimism towards ISKCON?
There's Srila Prabhupada's bona fide ISKCON, which is what Srila Prabhupada wanted/intended, and there's present-day ITS A CON. No bona fide follower of Srila Prabhupada would be "'pessimistic' towards ISKCON"; rather they would in regards to the deviated perversion that exists today. Srila Prabhupada Himself would be appalled. (Maybe you have no idea of what Srila Prabhupada's intended ISKCON was. Srila Prabhupada Himself at times expressed His upset with regards to leaders deviating HIS ISKCON movement, in the so many ways this was going on.)
**********************************
What is your point in regards to your comparing SRILA PRABHUPADA'S "Bhagavad-gita As It Is" to there being different versions of the Bible?; that there "should" - meaning, that Srila Prabhupada "wanted" that there "should"- be more or different versions of HIS "Bhagavad-gita As It Is"?
That doesn't sound too bona fide. Srila Prabhupada is THE!!! (ONE) Author of HIS "Bhagavad-gita As It Is," Srila Prabhupada's "Bhagavad-gita As It Is" supposed to be coming [bona fide] (AS IT IS) through the printing arm of ISKCON, the BBT. (But even all of that got changed around...) The history of the Bible has it's own "how it came about," (including in regards to the various existing present-day versions, along with their differences. There's quite a difference between the Bible and Srila Prabhupada's "Bhagavad-gita As It Is," and I'm NOT referring to content right now in this statement, but rather, in regards to "how they 'came about'," Srila Prabhupada's "Bhagavad-gita As It Is," made manifest WHILE Srila Prabhupada was present on the planet, Srila Prabhupada being it's ONE!!! Author, (of course Srila Prabhupada's translating Krsna's words, and give HIS, Srila Prabhupada's, purports).
So that's pretty foolish to give this - present-day versions of the Bible - as a comparison.
If Jesus Himself had written down His Own writings, and they were being changed... If the prophets writings were being changed...
Point being, Srila Prabhupada recently enough wrote (and had printed) His "Bhagavad-gita As It Is," and we know definitely that there are changes which have been made, including specifically things which Srila Prabhupada gave instruction to NOT change.
Your statement as written seems to say, "Well that's fine that they do whatever they want to Srila Prabhupada's books." - specifically your referring to Srila Prabhupada's "Bhagavad-gita As It Is" - After all, they've made different versions of the Bible, so why not Srila Prabhupada's books?"
If you're really feeling that this "is OK," then very sad indeed. Maybe one day there will be a "newer version" of Srila Prabhupada's book(s) that will tell us, "Have as much sex as you like because it's good exercise and is fun. Go and take as many drugs as you want, because it will make you feel better since this material world is a place of suffering. Go and eat meat because the taste you're looking for is the taste of ghee, and better to eat meat because it give you protein and makes you strong," etc., etc, etc.
I'm sure more people would appreciate those [kinds of] versions instead of the ones in which Srila Prabhupada tells us to NOT do these things.
Just to note, for some of us who know what the GBC has done, even though we don't like it, we will still go to render service to the devotees, including cleaning the stoolroom, washing pots, and...
I wonder how many GBC people would render these services, or even give a consideration to doing so...
By the way, why not ASK the GBC and certain of their cronies WHY they've KICKED OUT from [SRILA PRABHUPADA'S] ISKCON so many SERIOUS devotees who WERE WILLING to render (and WERE RENDERING) the services of cleaning the stoolrooms, washing the pots, etc.
If you’re just envious, maybe you should follow Prabhupada’s instructions and serve the devotees that you hate so much.
And WHY is it that when people are standing up for Srila Prabhupada, and/or question this and that deviation going on within ISKCON, and/or in regards to a specific ISKCON leader, we have someone calling them (accusing them of being) "envious," and/or accusing them of "'hating' the devotees."
Maybe what's needed is for people to read Srila Prabhupada's (bona fide) books, not some "version"...
Here's from Srila Prabhupada's BG 10.4 purport:
"Asammoha, freedom from doubt and delusion, can be achieved when one is not hesitant and when he understands the transcendental philosophy. Slowly but surely he becomes free from bewilderment. Nothing should be accepted blindly; everything should be accepted with care and with caution. Ksama, forgiveness, should be practiced, and one should excuse the minor offenses of others. Satyam,truthfulness, means that facts should be presented as they are for the benefit of others. Facts should not be misrepresented. According to social conventions, it is said that one can speak the truth only when it is palatable to others. But that is not truthfulness. The truth should be spoken in a straight and forward way, so that others will understand actually what the facts are. If a man is a thief and if people are warned that he is a thief, that is truth. Although sometimes the truth is unpalatable, one should not refrain from speaking it. Truthfulness demands that the facts be presented as they are for the benefit of others. That is the definition of truth."
Here are a few other things from Srimad Bhagavatam and our predecessor Acaryas:
SB 10.44.9,10
"Religious principles have certainly been violated in this assembly. One should not remain for even a moment in a place where irreligion is flourishing. A wise person should not enter an assembly if he knows the participants there are committing acts of impropriety. And if, having entered such an assembly, he fails to speak the truth, speaks falsely or pleads ignorance, he will certainly incur sin."
From Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur In a Harmonist article, "Chanters of the Kirtan of Lord Hari"
A chanter of the kirtana of Hari is necessarily the uncompromising enemy of worldliness and hypocrisy. As a chanter of the kirtana of Hari, it is his constant function to dispel all misconceptions by the preaching of the truth in a most unambiguous form, without any influence of person, place or time. That form has to be adopted which is least likely to be misunderstood. It is his bounden duty to oppose any person who tries to deceive and harm himself or other people by misrepresenting the truth either due to malice or genuine misunderstanding. This will be possible if the chanter of kirtana is always prepared to submit to be trodden on by thoughtless people if any discomfort to himself will enable him to do good to his persecutors by chanting the truth in the most unambiguous manner. If he is unwilling to chant the kirtana under all circumstances due to consideration of self-respect or personal discomfort, then he is unfit to be a preacher of the absolute truth. Humility implies perfect submission to the truth and no sympathy for untruth. A person who entertains any partiality for untruth is unfit to chant the kirtana of Hari. Any clinging to untruth is opposed to the principle of humility born of absolute submission to the truth.
Those who serve the Truth at all time, by means of all their faculties, and have no hankering for the trivialities of this world, are always necessarily free from malice born of competing worldliness and are, therefore, fit to admonish those who are actively engaged in harming themselves and others by the method of opposing or misrepresenting the Truth in order to attain rewards of such policy in the shape of a perpetuation of the state of misery and ignorance. The method which is employed by the servant of the good preceptor for preventing such misrepresentation of the truth is a part and parcel of the truth itself.
It may not always be pleasing to the diseased susceptibilities of deluded minds and may even be denounced by them as a malicious act with which they are only too familiar, but the words of truth from the lips of a loyal and humble servant of Hari possess such beneficent power that all effort to suppress or obstruct them only serves to vindicate to impartial minds the necessity of complete submission to the Absolute Truth as the only cure of the disease of wordliness. Humility that is employed in the unambiguous service of the Truth is necessarily and qualitatively different from its perverted prototype which is practised by the cunning people of this world for gaining their worldly ends. The professors of pseudo-humility have reason to be afraid of the preachings of the servants of Hari - one of whose duties is to expose the enormous possibility of mischief that is possessed by the forms of so-called spiritual conduct - when they are taken to task for serving the untruth.
Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur explains in regards to the difference between weakness and cheating (Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur Prabhupadera Upadesamrta):
“Cheating and weakness are two separate things. Persons devoid of a cheating propensity achieve perfection in life, but a cheater is never successful. Vaisnavism is another name for simplicity. Cheaters are nondevotees. Sincere persons can be weak, but they are not cheaters. Cheaters say something but do something else. Weak people are embarrassed by their defects, whereas cheaters are maddened by their achievements. “I will cheat the acharya,” “I will deceive the doctor,” “I will nourish the poisonous snake of my sinful propensity with banana and milk, hiding him in the hole of my cheating propensity,” and “I will demand name and fame from the people while posing as a saint”: These are not symptoms of weakness but of utter deceitfulness. Such cheaters will never achieve any good. By hearing humbly from saints with a sincere attitude, however, one will gradually attain auspiciousness. After accepting tridandi-sannyasa if one remains busy with worldly activities, thinking that family life is more important than spiritual life or maintaining the sinful mentality of kidnapping Sita from Rama as Ravana did even while dressed as a devotee, then one is a self-killer. We are far from the worship of Hari. Even if we have weakness and have enough anarthas to last us for millions of years, we are not as misfortunate as if we possessed a cheating propensity. It is better to take birth as animals or birds than to take shelter of cheating.”
This question was put to Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur: "Should we boldly speak the truth?"
Reply: "Without cheating anyone we should boldly speak the truth to everyone. If the truth is bitter or unpopular but bestows blessings on the living entities, we must speak it. This will not ultimately cause them anxiety...Unless we speak the truth boldly we cannot please guru and Gauranga. The more determined one is in devotional service, the bolder and more courageous he will be as a preacher. If I fail to speak the impartial truth because I might become unpopular, I have certainly abandoned the path of my disciplic succession and accepted an unauthorized path. In the end I will either find myself cheated or will become an atheist."
Srila Bhaktivinode Thakur: