Modified:
wiki/Container_1_1_PerformanceMetrics.wiki
Log:
Edited wiki page through web user interface.
Modified: wiki/Container_1_1_PerformanceMetrics.wiki
==============================================================================
--- wiki/Container_1_1_PerformanceMetrics.wiki (original)
+++ wiki/Container_1_1_PerformanceMetrics.wiki Tue Jul 29 17:40:16 2008
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
# Performance Metrics for Container v1.1 vs. spring, pico-container,
and hard-coded access.
-Here is a quick performance table for different containers, including
a "1st invocation" and an average for all following invocations. They
are all run on the same machine (Macbook Pro 2.4Ghz Dual-Core circa
2006) with identical component loading.
+Here is a quick performance table for different containers, including
a "1st invocation" and an average for all following invocations. They
are all run on the same machine (Macbook Pro 2.4Ghz Dual-Core circa
2006) with identical component loading.
+
+Note: I'm a big fan of Tapestry5, and I'm very confused as to why t5's
ioc container is so slow. I imagine I'm doing something wrong, but I
haven't had a chance to ask HLS why I would find this performance.
The startup costs and first invocation for each container are as follows: