[israfil-micro commit] r57 - wiki

[codesite...@google.com]

Author: christianedwardgruber
Date: Wed Jul 30 10:02:14 2008
New Revision: 57

Modified:
wiki/Container_1_1_PerformanceMetrics.wiki

Log:
Edited wiki page through web user interface.

Modified: wiki/Container_1_1_PerformanceMetrics.wiki
==============================================================================
--- wiki/Container_1_1_PerformanceMetrics.wiki (original)
+++ wiki/Container_1_1_PerformanceMetrics.wiki Wed Jul 30 10:02:14 2008
@@ -4,13 +4,15 @@

Note: I'm a big fan of Tapestry5, and I'm very confused as to why t5's
ioc container is so slow. I imagine I'm doing something wrong, but I
haven't had a chance to ask HLS why I would find this performance.

-We're testing in comparison with:
-|| Container name || Version ||
-|| Hard Coded || N/A ||
-|| T5-IOC || 5.0.11 ||
-|| Pico Container || 2.1 ||
-|| Spring || 2.5.4 ||
-|| Israfil Micro || 1.1 ||
+This test compared:
+|| Container name || Version || Configuration || Ratio to hard-coded ||
+|| Hard Coded || N/A || N/A || 1.0 ||
+|| T5-IOC || 5.0.11 || N/A || 1719.5 ||
+|| Pico Container || 2.1 || without cache || 512.5 ||
+|| Pico Container || 2.1 || with cache || 23.2 ||
+|| Spring || 2.5.4 ||N/A || 26.3 ||
+|| Israfil Micro || 1.1 || early resolution || 10.0 ||
+|| Israfil Micro || 1.1 || early late resolution || 10.7 ||

The startup costs and first invocation for each container are as follows: