Why are there so many people telling me to stop talking about Apollo?
What makes Apollo such a sensitive topic?
Consider that the major difference between Apollo and the September 11
attack, the Oklahoma City bombing, and the assassination of President
Kennedy is that Apollo is considered an "technical achievement" but the
others are "crimes".
A crime requires "criminals". In the case of president Kennedy, Oswald was
the criminal.
In the case of the Oklahoma City bombing, Tim McVeigh and the "right wing
extremists" were the criminals. They also had a "John Doe #2" who would be
described as an Arab, perhaps as a spare patsy in case McVeigh failed to
work out, or perhaps in case they decided to bring the Arabs into it.
The September 11 attack was designed so that the blame would go to the
mysterious "Al Queda", and if that failed, the blame would fall on other
groups, such as Pakistan's ISI, or Saudi Arabia.
However, Apollo was never a "crime", so nobody was set up to take blame
for it. Therefore, if the Apollo moon landing is exposed, the criminals
themselves are exposed. There are no patsies to protect the people behind
the Apollo moon hoax.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Axis_of_Perverts2.html
--
http://iamthewitness.com
http://www.truthtellers.org
http://www.globalresearch.ca
http://www.hugequestions.com