CORRECTION: The body of the text says "January 11th". It should be "March 11th", as in the Subject line. On 03.03.2021 15:44, Martin Kusch wrote: > Dear All, > > The Institute Vienna Circle and the Unit for Applied Philosophy of > Science and Epistemology (of the Department of Philosophy of the Univ. > of Vienna) are jointly organising a series of talks this term. > > The next talk will take place on January 11th, 3-5pm (CET). > > The speaker will be Dr. Charlotte Baumann (Technische Universität > Berlin). The title of her talk will be: > > "Hermann Cohen and the problem of the (empirical) object of knowledge" > (abstract and bio below). > > (Further speakers will be: 17 March: Mauricio Suarez; 25 March: > Jaroslav Peregrin; 15 April: Michael Hannon; 22 April: Caterina Sisti; > 29 April: Sander Verhaegh; 6 May: Linda Alcoff; 20 May: Heidi > Grasswick; 27 May: Adrian Currie; 10 June: Patricia Blanchette; 17 > June: Gaile Pohlhaus; 24 June: Marta Sznajder.) > > The meeting will be online via ZOOM: > > https://univienna.zoom.us/j/98767758229?pwd=ZkswaEh4TFNNSzkybDk4RmZOOXh3QT09 > > You can also log into our meetings through the Zoom application > (rather than by clicking the link above), by using the following > credentials: > > Meeting-ID: 987 6775 8229 > Password: IVC-APSE > > Abstract: > > Natural science is supposed to be true about nature. This may seem > evident and simple, but, for the neo-Kantian Hermann Cohen in 1885, it > is actually a hard problem that only exacerbates the general problem > of knowledge. Nature, or the object of knowledge, is meant to exist > independently of or, in the very least, be distinguishable from the > theories about it. This is not only an assumption that most scientists > hold as a matter of fact. It is also a necessary requirement for the > validation of theories and claims to truth: Only if there is an > independent object can you verify a theory with reference to it; > otherwise you can only say that a theory is internally consistent, but > neither that it is true or false about the object, nor that is better > than any other consistent theory. And you have not even started > thinking about sensible and logical aspects of objects and how > sensations can help verify scientific theories. In her talk, Charlotte > Baumann will explore two solutions to the problem of the (empirical) > objects of knowledge that Cohen discusses in his 1885 Kant's Theory of > Experience. > > Bio: > Charlotte Baumann, PhD, is a researcher at Technische Universität > Berlin, about to start her Humboldt Fellowship at University of > Sussex, UK. She has published on Kant, Hegel, neo-kantians, Marx and > Adorno in outlets like the European Journal of Philosophy, Journal of > the History of Philosophy, British Journal for the HIStory of > Philosophy and the Oxford Handbook on Adorno. She has been a > researcher at University College London and teaches in the outreach > program of Bard College Berlin. (For more information see: > http://www.drcharlottebaumann.com/) > > On behalf of the organizers, > Iulian Toader > Martin Kusch > > > Prof. Martin Kusch (he/they); University of Vienna > Institute Vienna Circle & Department of Philosophy > https://martinkusch.wixsite.com/website -- -------------------------------------------------------- Because of problems with tendinitis, I am using a dictation software. This increases the chances of stylistic and grammatical errors. My apologies! -------------------------------------------------------- Prof. Martin Kusch (he/they); University of Vienna Institute Vienna Circle & Department of Philosophy https://martinkusch.wixsite.com/website