could use mergemesh! >>>> I correct my script with mergsurf and use volface to access BH. >>>> Every thing is ok and my simulation is started. >>>

them using mergemesh; if they do intersect, you can merge them use surfboolean or mergesurf. I don't see a need to use remeshsurf. remeshsurf is a computationally expensive step

Chanyoung, mergemesh can't merge tetrahedral meshes that are overlapping. it simply concatenates the node/elem lists and does not check intersection at all. instead of merge

)/mergemesh (if not intersecting), then call s2m to create the final mesh. the quality is better if you do this way, but the cgalmesh output might just be sufficient (if you don'

] = mergemesh(node_hs,faces_hs,node_box,faces_box > ); > % sphere should be inside the domain of the bounding box: > [cnode,cface] = surfboolean(node_bb,faces_bb,

]=mergemesh(node1,elem1,node2,elem2,node3,elem3); >>>> >>>> % If true plot the cylinders >>>> if PLOT_CYLINDERS >>>>

]=mergemesh(no_beam_1,fa_beam_1,no_beam_2,fa_beam_2); >>> >>> % Create the final meshed volume of the bounding 20x20x5 mm box around >>> the inner

]=mergemesh(nobbx, fcbbx, nosp, fcsp); > > [cfg0.node, cfg0.elem]=s2m(no,fc(:,1:3),1,40,'tetgen',[41 1 1;s0]); > > cfg0.seg=cfg0.elem(:,5); >

]=mergemesh(skin_node,skin_elem,fat_node,fat_elem,muscle_node,muscle_elem); cfg.nphoton=1e6; cfg.node=comb_node; cfg.elem=comb_elem; cfg.elemprop=cfg.elem(

]=mergemesh(no_beam_1,fa_beam_1,no_beam_2,fa_beam_2); >>> >>> >>> % Create the meshed volume of the bounding 20x20x5 mm box around the >>

> using mergemesh to bring them together, the result looks like this: > > hi > > mergemesh() does not work when merging meshes that are overlapping (or > intersecting

]=mergemesh(no1,fc1,no2,fc2,no3,fc3); > > [node,elem]=s2m(no,fc,1,5,'tetgen',[0 0 0; 11 0 0; 21 0 0]); > > figure; > hold on > plotmesh([node(:,

just call mergemesh to concatenate the two into a single volumetric mesh: |[pialnode,pialelem]=mergemesh(plnode,plelem,prnode,prelem);| An alternative route is to use surf2vol

]=mergemesh(no{1},fc{1},no{2},fc{2},no{3},fc{3},no{4},fc{4}); plotmesh(noall,fcall,'x>100') p1 = [90 50 132]; p2 = [90 50 127]; p3 = [94 94 130]; p4 = [111 99 135

] = mergemesh(node1,face1,node2,face2); > [newnode,newface] = mergemesh(newnode,newface,node3,face3); > > > figure; > plotmesh(newnode,newface, '

I use mergemesh to combine both the, blood vessel and the brain template. The problem I face is the mesh of blood vessel overlaps with that of the brain (as shown in the attached figure

the function mergemesh. The problem with that is that the > intersecting meshes would just be divided. That doesn't work with my > problem, unfortunately. > > Any

]=mergemesh(node2,elem2,node3,elem3,node4,elem4); > > > hi Jan > > this is not going to work because each cubic mesh was generated > without knowing the boundary

into with mergemesh into one node, face data. After I used the surface2mesh but I always get PLC error that two subfaces are intersecting. And roughly I take a glance final corrupted

]=mergemesh(node1,elem1,node2,elem2,node4,elem4); img1=surf2vol(node1,face1,-11:0.1:11,-11:0.1:11,-11:0.1:11); img2=surf2vol(node2,face2,-11:0.1:11,-11:0.1

]=mergemesh(no1,fc1,no2,fc2);||| |||plotmesh(no,fc)||| |||| |||% rasterize both surfaces into volume masks img1=surf2vol(no1,fc1,[-11:0.1:21],-11:0.1:11,-11:0.1:

]=mergemesh(no1,fc1,no2,fc2,no3,fc3);||| > | > % define seeds for each region bounded by closed surfaces||| > |||seeds=[0 0 0; 15 0 0; 25 0 0]; | > ||| > seeds(:,4)

]=mergemesh(no1,fc1,no2,fc2); >> seeds=[1 1 1; 30 30 30]; >> [node,elem]=surf2mesh(no,fc,[],[],1,6,seeds,[]); >> plotmesh(node,elem,'x>30

]=mergemesh(nodesurf1,facesurf1, nodesurf2,facesurf2); hi Konstantinos if the two surfaces intersect each other, you can not simply merge them using mergemesh - mergemesh only

->mergemesh->surf2mesh/s2m. This approach also > give you more freedom for density control. The label-specific > density control is achieved by setting the 4-th element

] = mergemesh(no1,el1,no2,el2,no3,el3); >> >> >> %====Calculate mesh quality >> q = meshquality(node(:,1:3),elem(:,1:4)); >> subplot(1,

]=mergemesh(no_outer, fc_outer, ||...|| || no_cyl+repmat(||||cyl_center(1,:)||,size(no_cyl,1),1), fc_cyl , ...|| || no_cyl+repmat(|||||||cyl_center(2,:)|||,size

]=mergemesh(pnth,trih,pnti,trii,pnto,trio); figure('Color',[1 1 1]);plotmesh(pnt,tri,'y>0'); % attached file named SurfMesh xlabel('X'

Dear all, I am trying to downsample one interior surface of my model to achieve more time-efficient

]=mergemesh(nbox,fbox,nbox2,fbox2); > > > [nodev,elemv,facev]=surf2mesh(node,face,[],[],1,'1=0.5:2=0.1',[0 > 0 0;4 4 4],[],[]); > > > >