Dear all,
I am trying to downsample one interior surface of my model to achieve more time-efficient simulations, using remeshsurf for this process. While the downsample is done, some regions still have very high node density. Is there a way to control this node density ? if so, how to aquire a more evenly distributed position of the nodes?
--
Regards,Wagner
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iso2mesh-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to iso2mesh-user...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to iso2mes...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/iso2mesh-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
Hello Qianqian,
Thank you for you quick reply. I have tried using meshresample(), but as you pointed,I had some issue with self-intersecting elements, where the 'meshfix' option might not apply due to a disconnected region (not a single closed surface). I will try isolating those regions, resample them separately and merging afterwards to see if I can better results.
Thank you,Wagner
On Monday, January 26, 2015 at 12:00:08 PM UTC+1, wagner.rupp wrote:Dear all,
I am trying to downsample one interior surface of my model to achieve more time-efficient simulations, using remeshsurf for this process. While the downsample is done, some regions still have very high node density. Is there a way to control this node density ? if so, how to aquire a more evenly distributed position of the nodes?
Regards,Wagner
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iso2mesh-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to iso2mesh-user...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to iso2mes...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/iso2mesh-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi Qianqian
Just a quick feedback: those functions were really useful! The problem of high node density is gone and while the geometry is well preserved.
One thing I noticed is that the 'meshfix' option in meshcheckrepair() was removing some elements that it shouldn't, using the option 'intersect' this error didn't occur.
Once again, thank you for your helpWagner
On Monday, January 26, 2015 at 12:00:08 PM UTC+1, wagner.rupp wrote:Dear all,
I am trying to downsample one interior surface of my model to achieve more time-efficient simulations, using remeshsurf for this process. While the downsample is done, some regions still have very high node density. Is there a way to control this node density ? if so, how to aquire a more evenly distributed position of the nodes?
Regards,Wagner
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iso2mesh-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to iso2mesh-user...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to iso2mes...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/iso2mesh-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.