



I am confused - didn't you say you had a hexahedral mesh? I am
expecting 8-node solid elements, thus an elem array of N-by-8.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_mesh#/media/File:Three_Dim_Grid.PNG
did you manually split each hex into smaller tetrahedra?
in other words, what is the column number of your elem? and what
do the numbers in each column mean?
if you plan to do an FEM analysis on this domain, and your FEM
modeler does support tetrahedral mesh, my strongly recommend you
to create a coarse tetrahedral mesh instead - despite your
box-based mesh has voxel-level density, it is rather inaccurate
and inefficient because the voxel boundaries you saw are largely
due to discretization errors and does not reflect the shape of the
actual boundary. Creating a coarse tetrahedral mesh not only can
reduce your mesh density dramatically, but also help you restore
that smooth surface that was lost after rasterization.
You can consider running v2m or v2s to convert your volume to a tetrahedral or triangular mesh. Run the examples in iso2mesh/samples to see how it works.
Qianqian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iso2mesh-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to iso2mesh-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iso2mesh-users/9a0cc868-2d92-4bf6-94fd-93770a41349en%40googlegroups.com.