On 1/30/2013 11:40 AM, Ryker Exum wrote:
> In most cases this will get you to 2 pages in a hurry. I only like including
> 2 pages. If you have a PhD or do lots of research projects add a third page.
> The resume is just a conversation starter. Only give lead-ins so interviewer
> can use them as talking points.
> Follow up with interview with thank you email within 48h or so that includes
> 3-4 things you bring to the table and how they apply to the job.
That advice is spot-on:
The single most important piece of advice I can hand out from my brief
time as an infosec recruiter many moons ago is this:
"Nobody reading your resume gives a flying fuck about what you did for
your previous employers, they want to know what you're going to do for
them!".
Most resumes I run across read like this
Job Title A
- performed duties of job title A
- responsible for stuff that person in Job Title A would be
responsible for
- I don't think you understand what the role of Job Title A is, so
I'll explain it a little more here.
This goes just as much for infosec too. unless the title and the things
you did there were vastly incongruent, don't spell out the shit you did
as part of the job - you did the job, I get that already (assuming you
weren't fired for NOT doing the job). If you did something that was
impressive, but only due to the scale of the company ('managed
half-a-million endpoint devices while juggling the CEO's grandchildren's
daycare'), tell me something about how you managed to not suck at that
gargantuan task, that might translate to some value to me and my company
that spends less on payroll than your prior employer spent on coffee.
So many smart people write resumes that read like sick notes from their
mother, apologizing for why they aren't CEO yet.
When your resume arrives in the stack, it's one of a hundred that are
all alike - we ask the HR people - 'we want people with X years of
experience in X', and they bring us resumes that match that.
So given that your competition in the resume pool is a bunch of folks
that have *identical* experience to you.
The question is - how do you differentiate yourself from them?
In my opinion when interviewing people - being active in the infosec
community is a huge bonus right off the mark. One of my go-to questions
in interviewing people is "whose work in infosec do you respect the
most? Who's doing the cutting edge stuff out there right now? Where do
you go for most of your day to day technical security info?"
(Sadly most of the answers I get from many candidates are limited to
folks that they know their names from the mainstream tech news).
Imagine if you asked that same question of your surgeon - "who is the
best person in your medical specialization today in your opinion? and
where do you find the most interesting medical papers?" and their
response was "errr.. I dunno" and "Scientific American?"
Tl;Dr:
- I know what job roles in infosec are - don't explain them to me
- Highlight how you did that job better than other people could have
- Make it clear how you're different from the folks with otherwise
identical experience to you.
- Sell me on wanting to talk to you, but realize I'm gonna fact check
the shit out of everything about you before we do that.